netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik@metanetworks.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	eyal@metanetworks.com, shmulik@metanetworks.com,
	Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net] net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splitting gso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list
Date: Fri,  6 Sep 2019 12:23:50 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190906092350.13929-1-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com> (raw)

Historically, support for frag_list packets entering skb_segment() was
limited to frag_list members terminating on exact same gso_size
boundaries. This is verified with a BUG_ON since commit 89319d3801d1
("net: Add frag_list support to skb_segment"), quote:

    As such we require all frag_list members terminate on exact MSS
    boundaries.  This is checked using BUG_ON.
    As there should only be one producer in the kernel of such packets,
    namely GRO, this requirement should not be difficult to maintain.

However, since commit 6578171a7ff0 ("bpf: add bpf_skb_change_proto helper"),
the "exact MSS boundaries" assumption no longer holds:
An eBPF program using bpf_skb_change_proto() DOES modify 'gso_size', but
leaves the frag_list members as originally merged by GRO with the
original 'gso_size'. Example of such programs are bpf-based NAT46 or
NAT64.

This lead to a kernel BUG_ON for flows involving:
 - GRO generating a frag_list skb
 - bpf program performing bpf_skb_change_proto() or bpf_skb_adjust_room()
 - skb_segment() of the skb

See example BUG_ON reports in [0].

In commit 13acc94eff12 ("net: permit skb_segment on head_frag frag_list skb"),
skb_segment() was modified to support the "gso_size mangling" case of
a frag_list GRO'ed skb, but *only* for frag_list members having
head_frag==true (having a page-fragment head).

Alas, GRO packets having frag_list members with a linear kmalloced head
(head_frag==false) still hit the BUG_ON.

This commit adds support to skb_segment() for a 'head_skb' packet having
a frag_list whose members are *non* head_frag, with gso_size mangled, by
disabling SG and thus falling-back to copying the data from the given
'head_skb' into the generated segmented skbs - as suggested by Willem de
Bruijn [1].

Since this approach involves the penalty of skb_copy_and_csum_bits()
when building the segments, care was taken in order to enable this
solution only when required:
 - untrusted gso_size, by testing SKB_GSO_DODGY is set
   (SKB_GSO_DODGY is set by any gso_size mangling functions in
    net/core/filter.c)
 - the frag_list is non empty, its item is a non head_frag, *and* the
   headlen of the given 'head_skb' does not match the gso_size.

[0]
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20190826170724.25ff616f@pixies/
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/9265b93f-253d-6b8c-f2b8-4b54eff1835c@fb.com/

[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CA+FuTSfVsgNDi7c=GUU8nMg2hWxF2SjCNLXetHeVPdnxAW5K-w@mail.gmail.com/

Fixes: 6578171a7ff0 ("bpf: add bpf_skb_change_proto helper")
Suggested-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
---
v2: reorder the test conditions, as suggested by Alexander Duyck
---
 net/core/skbuff.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index ea8e8d332d85..d540d00b93a9 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -3670,6 +3670,25 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_segment(struct sk_buff *head_skb,
 	int pos;
 	int dummy;
 
+	if (list_skb && !list_skb->head_frag && skb_headlen(list_skb) &&
+	    (skb_shinfo(head_skb)->gso_type & SKB_GSO_DODGY)) {
+		/* gso_size is untrusted, and we have a frag_list with a linear
+		 * non head_frag head.
+		 *
+		 * (we assume checking the first list_skb member suffices;
+		 * i.e if either of the list_skb members have non head_frag
+		 * head, then the first one has too).
+		 *
+		 * If head_skb's headlen does not fit requested gso_size, it
+		 * means that the frag_list members do NOT terminate on exact
+		 * gso_size boundaries. Hence we cannot perform skb_frag_t page
+		 * sharing. Therefore we must fallback to copying the frag_list
+		 * skbs; we do so by disabling SG.
+		 */
+		if (mss != GSO_BY_FRAGS && mss != skb_headlen(head_skb))
+			features &= ~NETIF_F_SG;
+	}
+
 	__skb_push(head_skb, doffset);
 	proto = skb_network_protocol(head_skb, &dummy);
 	if (unlikely(!proto))
-- 
2.19.1


             reply	other threads:[~2019-09-06  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-06  9:23 Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2019-09-06 20:15 ` [PATCH v2 net] net: gso: Fix skb_segment splat when splitting gso_size mangled skb having linear-headed frag_list Willem de Bruijn
2019-09-06 20:51   ` Alexander Duyck
2019-09-07 16:00 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190906092350.13929-1-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
    --to=shmulik@metanetworks.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=eyal@metanetworks.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).