From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDCAC49ED6 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1942084D for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="D8Hx/fYz" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728482AbfIKPbv (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:31:51 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f196.google.com ([209.85.160.196]:33105 "EHLO mail-qt1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726762AbfIKPbv (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:31:51 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f196.google.com with SMTP id r5so25780939qtd.0 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:31:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fcyFNHqbA8t2ouOnvXyDw8aeh23VL36IBxhbnb43Rjc=; b=D8Hx/fYz3OvsUUjqKx1EHL+4qGF/pg+7OpcRyX1lJcFh3TZoMmFOHNZXE7CW6gvw4c CC4Pf+Tew1I/hs/V/pgOhoOHL6mmg9iPZB3t8GHO0rR4yEnosnPWXo/DKjI8ajLLl167 NnzmMa5L0anCckxryjfg/ZesxvUxH2NRDVBISxnRj/p0rTKmc++lQMSTea7zprJjbUKU yodHW9VtbJYsmtkeDH3j9+YMYK7hbuKBZ4/F2BM9cS/Iu8h1WnJLB7zOxUq4PVr/gaq6 ucK+BOW4qD5n/zW38EUIDhBRHTcj3xHkX0bSor350FADHexoFQ8N6bjWSP1Pc8afM+iH NZlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding; bh=fcyFNHqbA8t2ouOnvXyDw8aeh23VL36IBxhbnb43Rjc=; b=eoVyucG1UrK2n/xCPAorJFt+aKBUts4UFh+kVmYmeYvikrgFQimKH8fRpo60e1fLyY Yfypbf+AyPOrGbo+YiWfqyHQAG6lBWGvVlH9kwrBwAHwPvfisxES78VDjjHctoBlpdpO 8eFASM9HUCTTDuo0EMO4IzbL7XMtCNUxNnnqs/s/mxoMEu7NQua1dK5mxJGk2m0HW6Ar 1cS6TcVTlAlhMHgw4JYZlJere/8ksz3JE7/X1Zqm83RAoozt9omPUAxnWjVVNpO5KYEh v6imEdfMfyMWYXxrC8dYkMQ6AIqzVMKsgUJjDFvKN5G5iZsUQQT9xqfoZXC/EFFzmiMl dMWA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW5Uk9CCJpOxWcrrtIvK3l9P9Jy/x7i/w/fxLkaUm0vfLKRgc5E ch9SpxfU/Rh2CzxJWVmM5F//xLRhX64= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwnng+Yhsjl3UQVJc3KS1KvPTszf5lH4jqC+jA1Bobn+VCSFBhkWvI8pjCzMQO6SXRYeMvBSA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7b2a:: with SMTP id l10mr1200781qtu.115.1568215910184; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (modemcable249.105-163-184.mc.videotron.ca. [184.163.105.249]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 8sm7410698qto.6.2019.09.11.08.31.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 11:31:48 -0400 Message-ID: <20190911113148.GB1435@t480s.localdomain> From: Vivien Didelot To: Robert Beckett Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , "David S. Miller" , bob.beckett@collabora.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: features to handle network storms In-Reply-To: <3f265c5afcb2eea48410ec607d65e8f4e6a20373.camel@collabora.com> References: <20190910154238.9155-1-bob.beckett@collabora.com> <20190910131951.GM32337@t480s.localdomain> <3f265c5afcb2eea48410ec607d65e8f4e6a20373.camel@collabora.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi Robert, On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:46:05 +0100, Robert Beckett wrote: > > Feature series targeting netdev must be prefixed "PATCH net-next". As > > Thanks for the info. Out of curiosity, where should I have gleaned this > info from? This is my first contribution to netdev, so I wasnt familiar > with the etiquette. > > > this approach was a PoC, sending it as "RFC net-next" would be even > > more > > appropriate. Netdev being a huge subsystem has specific rules for subject prefix or merge window, which are described in Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst Thank you, Vivien