From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: ncardwell@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, ycheng@google.com, soheil@google.com,
edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: fix tcp_ecn_withdraw_cwr() to clear TCP_ECN_QUEUE_CWR
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 00:54:17 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190912.005417.251757766535771790.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190909205602.248472-1-ncardwell@google.com>
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 16:56:02 -0400
> Fix tcp_ecn_withdraw_cwr() to clear the correct bit:
> TCP_ECN_QUEUE_CWR.
>
> Rationale: basically, TCP_ECN_DEMAND_CWR is a bit that is purely about
> the behavior of data receivers, and deciding whether to reflect
> incoming IP ECN CE marks as outgoing TCP th->ece marks. The
> TCP_ECN_QUEUE_CWR bit is purely about the behavior of data senders,
> and deciding whether to send CWR. The tcp_ecn_withdraw_cwr() function
> is only called from tcp_undo_cwnd_reduction() by data senders during
> an undo, so it should zero the sender-side state,
> TCP_ECN_QUEUE_CWR. It does not make sense to stop the reflection of
> incoming CE bits on incoming data packets just because outgoing
> packets were spuriously retransmitted.
>
> The bug has been reproduced with packetdrill to manifest in a scenario
> with RFC3168 ECN, with an incoming data packet with CE bit set and
> carrying a TCP timestamp value that causes cwnd undo. Before this fix,
> the IP CE bit was ignored and not reflected in the TCP ECE header bit,
> and sender sent a TCP CWR ('W') bit on the next outgoing data packet,
> even though the cwnd reduction had been undone. After this fix, the
> sender properly reflects the CE bit and does not set the W bit.
>
> Note: the bug actually predates 2005 git history; this Fixes footer is
> chosen to be the oldest SHA1 I have tested (from Sep 2007) for which
> the patch applies cleanly (since before this commit the code was in a
> .h file).
>
> Fixes: bdf1ee5d3bd3 ("[TCP]: Move code from tcp_ecn.h to tcp*.c and tcp.h & remove it")
> Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
> Acked-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
> Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@google.com>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks Neal.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-09 20:56 [PATCH net] tcp: fix tcp_ecn_withdraw_cwr() to clear TCP_ECN_QUEUE_CWR Neal Cardwell
2019-09-09 21:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-09-11 22:54 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190912.005417.251757766535771790.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).