[PATCH net-next] mvpp2: remove misleading comment

* [PATCH net-next] mvpp2: remove misleading comment
@ 2019-10-02 21:49 Matteo Croce
  2019-10-02 23:25 ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matteo Croce @ 2019-10-02 21:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: David S. Miller, Antoine Tenart, Maxime Chevallier, linux-kernel

Recycling in mvpp2 has gone long time ago, but two comment still refers
to it. Remove those two misleading comments as they generate confusion.

Fixes: 7ef7e1d949cd ("net: mvpp2: drop useless fields in mvpp2_bm_pool and related code")
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
index 111b3b8239e1..5fea65256b9d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
@@ -2863,7 +2863,7 @@ static void mvpp2_rx_csum(struct mvpp2_port *port, u32 status,
 	skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_NONE;
 }
 
-/* Reuse skb if possible, or allocate a new skb and add it to BM pool */
+/* Allocate a new skb and add it to BM pool */
 static int mvpp2_rx_refill(struct mvpp2_port *port,
 			   struct mvpp2_bm_pool *bm_pool, int pool)
 {
@@ -2871,7 +2871,6 @@ static int mvpp2_rx_refill(struct mvpp2_port *port,
 	phys_addr_t phys_addr;
 	void *buf;
 
-	/* No recycle or too many buffers are in use, so allocate a new skb */
 	buf = mvpp2_buf_alloc(port, bm_pool, &dma_addr, &phys_addr,
 			      GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!buf)
-- 
2.21.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread