From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Pankaj Sharma <pankj.sharma@samsung.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-can@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
wg@grandegger.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, davem@davemloft.net,
eugen.hristev@microchip.com, ludovic.desroches@microchip.com,
pankaj.dubey@samsung.com, rcsekar@samsung.com,
Pankaj Sharma <pankj.sharma@samsung.com>,
Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: m_can: add support for handling arbitration error
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:04:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201910142340.H1Itv6kZ%lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1571052844-22633-1-git-send-email-pankj.sharma@samsung.com>
Hi Pankaj,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on net/master]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc3 next-20191014]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pankaj-Sharma/can-m_can-add-support-for-handling-arbitration-error/20191014-193532
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
coccinelle warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c:783:9-10: WARNING: return of 0/1 in function 'is_protocol_err' with return type bool
Please review and possibly fold the followup patch.
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-14 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20191014113437epcas5p2143d7e85d5a50dad79a4a60a9d666fe4@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2019-10-14 11:34 ` [PATCH] can: m_can: add support for handling arbitration error Pankaj Sharma
2019-10-14 12:31 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2019-10-17 11:51 ` pankj.sharma
2019-10-14 13:04 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-14 15:04 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2019-10-14 15:04 ` [PATCH] can: m_can: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings kbuild test robot
2019-10-15 5:57 ` Simon Horman
2019-10-15 6:37 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2019-10-15 7:13 ` Simon Horman
2019-10-15 8:32 ` Jeroen Hofstee
2019-10-17 11:54 ` pankj.sharma
2019-10-14 16:20 ` [PATCH] can: m_can: add support for handling arbitration error kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201910142340.H1Itv6kZ%lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eugen.hristev@microchip.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
--cc=pankj.sharma@samsung.com \
--cc=rcsekar@samsung.com \
--cc=sriram.dash@samsung.com \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).