From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B8AECE58E for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 19:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B56221925 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 19:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netronome-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@netronome-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="Q3/Kxif9" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2437218AbfJQTra (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 15:47:30 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f65.google.com ([209.85.167.65]:35904 "EHLO mail-lf1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389032AbfJQTra (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 15:47:30 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f65.google.com with SMTP id u16so2857212lfq.3 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:47:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netronome-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zYGMJ+5PSGcdhjynebhBJhlpuCtpM8ZplePlhSfxjME=; b=Q3/Kxif9xGcx9fh2rCVwvpAC5PCK+TIvubfg+KB42sTWAn9NMBF+I+aG60WiLAWpP6 j2LaN3VCsgzq3jip+eEEiOV1kDXIqmU08kLNBPN4sh9unoCSGd76OBidkglQJFwd0OHG YBHtHrztf/j63vRwprhC4YXCRjndHenbrb+NCx4FSyHowOJR+R4HhfkQf/rUQRY9YolT cyPqoKOJKBwGxJ0hwx/YrM7XAhxE2dOWPM0zPfVBZ84Dfvfk/axJoxOrhzS/i/btvEV9 P2jZL0R8KBzR+4g7c2xFNqk5IuVjnDB9pkj60u9QiCzOkqwm/xyeESZNr5at2WTvzLIC ID2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zYGMJ+5PSGcdhjynebhBJhlpuCtpM8ZplePlhSfxjME=; b=O2oHpsbU8Ne011cQgn93C8oWB7piuqC9jcQ3qFRElcAbHFLP1sKa7nQuanEfxOJutx E29rIg8geyG8K6aPPB8CE9mXYWI517j8I/JRd+TZFObnaKBxHw3MXv+PYfw4QjWOZ9yp fjIjC38gVCRQoIrHSY8fLEm6IEii+yKytifNTCr3+KyBBJI6bot9Y+IRXJcukZq7QygM RaViGFhamwJZK88WTneFnMhDSCfXETiRVS6XIC8zOnbVk7ToTB4O0cJFQS59/nzizUzt rU7u+gnQOxeARwy2uHPP8urqHfULe8+Js/zQK9fCwLTiEQ9d3X/Mrpr885VKNaF2bsQQ 0tFg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWYUgqZZgi+vXit9iOgUGGCF3OgAtOAOY2NetWlCjpivRUKgxZd zOcdr/Dpz2fyFkplx1FLRGhUbgnARyA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx8PbIJTWdvtFe2hKfutM9I0amUKD1ekLbBKOuaVfQLJhzUlRtGuo6sma4UBDt0W3puEzM4Hg== X-Received: by 2002:a19:f712:: with SMTP id z18mr3168396lfe.166.1571341648082; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:47:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cakuba.netronome.com ([66.60.152.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t8sm2778254ljd.18.2019.10.17.12.47.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:47:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:47:21 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Andrew Lunn Cc: David Miller , netdev , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Add devlink param for ATU hash algorithm. Message-ID: <20191017124721.6b5a6427@cakuba.netronome.com> In-Reply-To: <20191017192055.23770-3-andrew@lunn.ch> References: <20191017192055.23770-1-andrew@lunn.ch> <20191017192055.23770-3-andrew@lunn.ch> Organization: Netronome Systems, Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 21:20:55 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote: > Some of the marvell switches have bits controlling the hash algorithm > the ATU uses for MAC addresses. In some industrial settings, where all > the devices are from the same manufacture, and hence use the same OUI, > the default hashing algorithm is not optimal. Allow the other > algorithms to be selected via devlink. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski