From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1EFC43331 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84932084F for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="NiaaLD2Y" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727257AbfKLNbs (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:31:48 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:35750 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725865AbfKLNbr (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Nov 2019 08:31:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=+iMNtfFuKMPapocSrYm5/yUtVQ820Y9VqKwYVdIubW8=; b=NiaaLD2Yv5aWU5N8OMZn/RGWex c7KYLimfibMoZq34x5/N9KaTjwn1AUEMTC/7xiXhYdQUKFDZ/JpFUc4FhC7TCUMXJllPPG2cHNvs7 f0+zxtqUIlgjj1Ie8u5DWdkPk5DNuo/WA43u10A8/6wX66RCFWSWwh8pzGnj0OU6gFT8=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.92.2) (envelope-from ) id 1iUWGh-0001Yx-RF; Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:31:39 +0100 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 14:31:39 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, davem@davemloft.net, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, joergen.andreasen@microchip.com, allan.nielsen@microchip.com, horatiu.vultur@microchip.com, claudiu.manoil@nxp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/12] net: mscc: ocelot: filter out ocelot SoC specific PCS config from common path Message-ID: <20191112133139.GD5090@lunn.ch> References: <20191112124420.6225-1-olteanv@gmail.com> <20191112124420.6225-3-olteanv@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191112124420.6225-3-olteanv@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 02:44:10PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > From: Claudiu Manoil > > The adjust_link routine should be generic enough to be (re)used by > any SoC that integrates a switch core compatible with the Ocelot > core switch driver. Currently all configurations are generic except > for the PCS settings that are SoC specific. Move these out to the > Ocelot SoC/board instance. > > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn Andrew