From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74513C43603 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4712521D7D for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726599AbfLSI0F (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2019 03:26:05 -0500 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:42228 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726439AbfLSI0F (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2019 03:26:05 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D79020184; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:26:03 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id enA1yM1AhO2X; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:26:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-essen-01.secunet.de (mail-essen-01.secunet.de [10.53.40.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0DE4200AC; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:26:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mail-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:26:02 +0100 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 757053180373; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:26:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:26:02 +0100 From: Steffen Klassert To: Willem de Bruijn CC: David Miller , Paolo Abeni , Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner , Network Development Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] udp: Support UDP fraglist GRO/GSO. Message-ID: <20191219082602.GT8621@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <20191218133458.14533-1-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> <20191218133458.14533-5-steffen.klassert@secunet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 11:03:09AM -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:35 AM Steffen Klassert > wrote: > > > @@ -544,6 +585,18 @@ INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE int udp4_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb, int nhoff) > > const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb); > > struct udphdr *uh = (struct udphdr *)(skb->data + nhoff); > > > > + if (NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_flist) { > > + uh->len = htons(skb->len - nhoff); > > + > > + skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_type |= (SKB_GSO_FRAGLIST|SKB_GSO_UDP_L4); > > + skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_segs = NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->count; > > + > > + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY; > > + skb->csum_level = ~0; > > why is this needed for ipv4 only? It is needed for IPv6 too, I've just forgot to add it there. Thanks for the review!