From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC patch 05/19] perf/bpf: Remove preempt disable around BPF invocation
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 14:39:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200214161503.382318072@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200214133917.304937432@linutronix.de
The BPF invocation from the perf event overflow handler does not require to
disable preemption because this is called from NMI or at least hard
interrupt context which is already non-preemptible.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/events/core.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -9206,7 +9206,6 @@ static void bpf_overflow_handler(struct
int ret = 0;
ctx.regs = perf_arch_bpf_user_pt_regs(regs);
- preempt_disable();
if (unlikely(__this_cpu_inc_return(bpf_prog_active) != 1))
goto out;
rcu_read_lock();
@@ -9214,7 +9213,6 @@ static void bpf_overflow_handler(struct
rcu_read_unlock();
out:
__this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
- preempt_enable();
if (!ret)
return;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-14 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-14 13:39 [RFC patch 00/19] bpf: Make BPF and PREEMPT_RT co-exist Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 01/19] sched: Provide migrate_disable/enable() inlines Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 02/19] sched: Provide cant_migrate() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 03/19] bpf: Update locking comment in hashtab code Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 04/19] bpf/tracing: Remove redundant preempt_disable() in __bpf_trace_run() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-19 16:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-19 17:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 06/19] bpf: Dont iterate over possible CPUs with interrupts disabled Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 07/19] bpf: Provide BPF_PROG_RUN_PIN_ON_CPU() macro Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 18:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-02-14 19:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 08/19] bpf: Replace cant_sleep() with cant_migrate() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 09/19] bpf: Use BPF_PROG_RUN_PIN_ON_CPU() at simple call sites Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-19 1:39 ` Vinicius Costa Gomes
2020-02-19 9:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-19 16:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-02-21 0:20 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-21 14:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-21 14:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-21 22:15 ` Kees Cook
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 10/19] trace/bpf: Use migrate disable in trace_call_bpf() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 11/19] bpf/tests: Use migrate disable instead of preempt disable Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 12/19] bpf: Use migrate_disable/enabe() in trampoline code Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 13/19] bpf: Use migrate_disable/enable in array macros and cgroup/lirc code Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 14/19] bpf: Use migrate_disable() in hashtab code Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 19:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-02-14 19:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-18 23:36 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-02-19 0:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-19 1:23 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-02-19 15:17 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-02-20 4:19 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 15/19] bpf: Use migrate_disable() in sys_bpf() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 16/19] bpf: Factor out hashtab bucket lock operations Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 17/19] bpf: Prepare hashtab locking for PREEMPT_RT Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 18/19] bpf, lpm: Make locking RT friendly Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 13:39 ` [RFC patch 19/19] bpf/stackmap: Dont trylock mmap_sem with PREEMPT_RT and interrupts disabled Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-14 17:53 ` [RFC patch 00/19] bpf: Make BPF and PREEMPT_RT co-exist David Miller
2020-02-14 18:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-17 12:59 ` [PATCH] bpf: Enforce map preallocation for all instrumentation programs Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-15 20:09 ` [RFC patch 00/19] bpf: Make BPF and PREEMPT_RT co-exist Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200214161503.382318072@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).