netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
To: Vladis Dronov <vdronov@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptp: free ptp clock properly
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 08:36:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200305073653.GC267906@xps-13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1830360600.13123996.1583352704368.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>

On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 03:11:44PM -0500, Vladis Dronov wrote:
> Hello, Andrea, all,
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Andrea Righi" <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] ptp: free ptp clock properly
> > 
> > There is a bug in ptp_clock_unregister() where ptp_clock_release() can
> > free up resources needed by posix_clock_unregister() to properly destroy
> > a related sysfs device.
> > 
> > Fix this by calling posix_clock_unregister() in ptp_clock_release().
> 
> Honestly, this does not seem right. The calls at PTP clock release are:
> 
> ptp_clock_unregister() -> posix_clock_unregister() -> cdev_device_del() ->
> -> ... bla ... -> ptp_clock_release()
> 
> So, it looks like with this patch both posix_clock_unregister() and
> ptp_clock_release() are not called at all. And it looks like the "fix" is
> not removing PTP clock's cdev, i.e. leaking it and related sysfs resources.

That's absolutely right, thanks for the clarification!

With my "fix" we don't see the the kernel oops anymore, but we're
leaking resources, so definitely not a valid fix.

> 
> I would guess that a kernel in question (5.3.0-40-generic) has the commit
> a33121e5487b but does not have the commit 75718584cb3c, which should be
> exactly fixing a docking station disconnect crash. Could you please,
> check this?

Unfortunately the kernel in question already has 75718584cb3c:
https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-kernel/ubuntu/+source/linux/+git/bionic/commit/?h=hwe&id=c71b774732f997ef38ed7bd62e73891a01f2bbfe

It looks like there's something else that can free up too early the
resources required by posix_clock_unregister() to destroy the related
sysfs files.

Maybe what we really need to call from ptp_clock_release() is
pps_unregister_source()? Something like this:

From: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ptp: free ptp clock properly

There is a bug in ptp_clock_unregister() where ptp_clock_release() can
free up resources needed by posix_clock_unregister() to properly destroy
a related sysfs device.

Fix this by calling pps_unregister_source() in ptp_clock_release().

See also:
commit 75718584cb3c ("ptp: free ptp device pin descriptors properly").

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864754
Fixes: a33121e5487b ("ptp: fix the race between the release of ptp_clock and cdev")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c | 8 +++-----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
index ac1f2bf9e888..468286ef61ad 100644
--- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
+++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
@@ -170,6 +170,9 @@ static void ptp_clock_release(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct ptp_clock *ptp = container_of(dev, struct ptp_clock, dev);
 
+	/* Release the clock's resources. */
+	if (ptp->pps_source)
+		pps_unregister_source(ptp->pps_source);
 	ptp_cleanup_pin_groups(ptp);
 	mutex_destroy(&ptp->tsevq_mux);
 	mutex_destroy(&ptp->pincfg_mux);
@@ -298,11 +301,6 @@ int ptp_clock_unregister(struct ptp_clock *ptp)
 		kthread_cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ptp->aux_work);
 		kthread_destroy_worker(ptp->kworker);
 	}
-
-	/* Release the clock's resources. */
-	if (ptp->pps_source)
-		pps_unregister_source(ptp->pps_source);
-
 	posix_clock_unregister(&ptp->clock);
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.25.0

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-05  7:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-04 17:53 [PATCH] ptp: free ptp clock properly Andrea Righi
2020-03-04 20:11 ` Vladis Dronov
2020-03-05  7:36   ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2020-03-05 10:47     ` Vladis Dronov
2020-03-05 10:58       ` Andrea Righi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200305073653.GC267906@xps-13 \
    --to=andrea.righi@canonical.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=vdronov@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).