From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFD4C3F2D7 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 23:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E4020801 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 23:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="WxFZB3Gw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726769AbgCEXs3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 18:48:29 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:41713 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726128AbgCEXs3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 18:48:29 -0500 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48YSB155jSz9sP7; Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:48:25 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1583452106; bh=aKI80ctxF7IvsW1krFEsE8cXOaKoo4tVc2DQGlUj7rI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WxFZB3GwZo6Ut4w78eBhRwny/yH4RSgXiwcxD5cc3se6aUgSML98td+Lzj7j4WATJ xa5dxrFC4sHrgN1WZ7CEn5GQ9ckIJG+C9pCbre539QRgCK5sgfyAL16gO0CB2h003n +MaUlaahiBtvGaQG0/gWvHD/LSKOWs0L6fZYbHE7mITHkOXTqt3ZzbjmWzsw9lNHSn e4oTj6M9j2VI3kJitMLrK5LlQvjtwa4cyC5h0/yhDYdUuGC7jGbuWDg3ZoxZCzxmzD 7gZN4qdrc3ogMuy8KYP5DubWvO05JEtbY/MmeeEjnATJsouquJCXnjv/OysBBAvm7S GF1icts+c4YEA== Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2020 10:48:25 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Samuel Ortiz Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Miller , Networking , Johannes Berg Subject: Re: linux-next: the nfc-next tree seems to be old Message-ID: <20200306104825.068268eb@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20200130105538.7b07b150@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20200130105538.7b07b150@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/jZ4rfO48cZsNWT59fxfh2e/"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/jZ4rfO48cZsNWT59fxfh2e/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 10:55:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > Hi Samuel, >=20 > I noticed that the nfc-next tree has not changed since June 2018 and > has been orphaned in May 2019, so am wondering if the commits in it are > still relevant or should I just remove the tree from linux-next. Since I have had no response, I will remove it tomorrow. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/jZ4rfO48cZsNWT59fxfh2e/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl5hj8kACgkQAVBC80lX 0GxKXQf/QrO0WJTnS2wQvjtyNK40yRXdrrmm6M8Oim+Rwv3/BL6RCTPSXkoXngAD bkKuOZ1S3hs6dJy9YI31pFjJ4dU80gZgyKidcAggX5zBba2xqlAaBm5n7f4BMkis z13+zYkHlnD0KSFtItp3rZa0eXbW3lx24baJxzluJFfJxMH8PUx9uM5uiPxUO48U uo77cNLpiyfRXTHYu8t+hpTwhfXZkPacpQM4fSCkK9CdfJV0ibbO5xMsia4GfhLl KeC1+EHvKTt6G/PECYLr08Oi776kFAZLeHkZxS1EHE2WLGo6HYKOJtVKm0uM+yyT Q/4VzFZx0GuQeHieQ3Bpu7LPGL849g== =OkeH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/jZ4rfO48cZsNWT59fxfh2e/--