From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9176C10F27 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915D020828 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:55:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swordarmor.fr header.i=@swordarmor.fr header.b="UEi3bb0y"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swordarmor.fr header.i=@swordarmor.fr header.b="GWu1tcCX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726637AbgCIKzQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:55:16 -0400 Received: from edrik.securmail.fr ([45.91.125.3]:30019 "EHLO edrik.securmail.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725956AbgCIKzQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2020 06:55:16 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 385 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 06:55:16 EDT Received: by edrik.securmail.fr (Postfix, from userid 58) id 2105CB0E73; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 11:48:50 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swordarmor.fr; s=swordarmor; t=1583750930; bh=Hyq12REpSpK2B3QWJlrzz7d5lEQcrvGRpkB/+KJZMeQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=UEi3bb0yTSLGrDRyoR6FmcuB6oy+cMVH5+vYBlS2COmEs4JtdjfUgf74f3dxLCIt+ vP3250USBBOyf6P47W5AjUZir+lFcJWQXyd7Z4GqRU95JjmvxnWKvs4jRdD7MfPTuS qG1+BALwug7HhPytxr3jMmA2Q7TqljzJ0V+xZbdA= Received: from mew.swordarmor.fr (mew.swordarmor.fr [IPv6:2a00:5884:102:1::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: alarig@swordarmor.fr) by edrik.securmail.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84AFBB0E6C; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 11:47:36 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: edrik.securmail.fr/84AFBB0E6C; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=swordarmor.fr DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swordarmor.fr; s=swordarmor; t=1583750856; bh=Hyq12REpSpK2B3QWJlrzz7d5lEQcrvGRpkB/+KJZMeQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=GWu1tcCXWb2kqwhOTJyUZRMGYSNi6aA5S96v4Cs2sTRSu9/otR/DC+Y4Ebr4We6s9 fvOAqiT6TiS6pxlF5r3erDsO64H97svpIjkw1cCJbLxVkB3KfQJY+qpoz1VUDTUI3s xBo12KC8H99Xkrj6pe0irv3Af4J7lxcvO8FAW1PY= Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 11:47:31 +0100 From: Alarig Le Lay To: Fabian =?utf-8?Q?Gr=C3=BCnbichler?= Cc: David Ahern , Vincent Bernat , jack@basilfillan.uk, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IPv6 regression introduced by commit 3b6761d18bc11f2af2a6fc494e9026d39593f22c Message-ID: <20200309104731.uiqadwdk6ux3sy65@mew.swordarmor.fr> References: <20200305081747.tullbdlj66yf3w2w@mew.swordarmor.fr> <20200308105729.72pbglywnahbl7hs@mew.swordarmor.fr> <27457094-b62a-f029-e259-f7a274fee49d@gmail.com> <1583744251.2qt66u32rz.astroid@nora.none> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1583744251.2qt66u32rz.astroid@nora.none> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On lun. 9 mars 09:59:30 2020, Fabian Grünbichler wrote: > On March 9, 2020 3:15 am, David Ahern wrote: > > On 3/8/20 4:57 AM, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > >> On sam. 7 mars 17:52:10 2020, David Ahern wrote: > >> I have the problem with 5.3 (proxmox 6), so unless FIB handling has been > >> changed since then, I doubt that it will works, but I will try on > >> Monday. > >> > > > > a fair amount of changes went in through 5.4 including improvements to > > neighbor handling. 5.4 (I think) also had changes around dumping the > > route cache. > > FWIW, there is a 5.4-based kernel preview package available in the > pvetest repository for Proxmox VE 6.x: > > http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pve/dists/buster/pvetest/binary-amd64/pve-kernel-5.4.22-1-pve_5.4.22-1_amd64.deb Thanks for the kernel! I’m still having some issues with 5.4: root@hv03:~# ip -6 -ts monitor neigh | grep -P 'INCOMPLETE|FAILED' [2020-03-09T11:35:51.276329] 2a00:5884:0:6::2 dev vmbr12 router FAILED [2020-03-09T11:36:03.308359] fe80::5287:89ff:fef0:ce81 dev vmbr12 router FAILED [2020-03-09T11:36:21.996250] 2a00:5884:0:6::1 dev vmbr12 router FAILED [2020-03-09T11:36:32.524389] 2a00:5884:0:6::1 dev vmbr12 router FAILED [2020-03-09T11:36:34.800303] 2a00:5884:0:6::2 dev vmbr12 router FAILED [2020-03-09T11:36:36.588333] 2a00:5884:0:6::1 dev vmbr12 router FAILED [2020-03-09T11:36:41.196351] 2a00:5884:0:6::1 dev vmbr12 router FAILED And BGP sessions are flapping as well: root@hv03:~# birdc6 sh pr | grep bgp ibgp_asbr01_ipv6 BGP master up 11:40:28 Established ibgp_asbr02_ipv6 BGP master up 11:41:09 Established root@hv03:~# ps -o lstart -p $(pgrep bird6) STARTED Mon Mar 9 11:14:44 2020 You don’t build linux-perf? I can only find it on the debian repo but not on the proxmox one nor http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pve/dists/buster/pvetest/binary-amd64/ root@hv03:~# apt search linux-perf Sorting... Done Full Text Search... Done linux-perf/stable 4.19+105+deb10u3 all Performance analysis tools for Linux (meta-package) linux-perf-4.19/stable 4.19.98-1 amd64 Performance analysis tools for Linux 4.19 root@hv03:~# apt policy linux-perf/stable N: Unable to locate package linux-perf/stable root@hv03:~# apt policy linux-perf linux-perf: Installed: (none) Candidate: 4.19+105+deb10u3 Version table: 4.19+105+deb10u3 500 500 http://mirror.grifon.fr/debian buster/main amd64 Packages root@hv03:~# apt policy linux-perf-4.19 linux-perf-4.19: Installed: (none) Candidate: 4.19.98-1 Version table: 4.19.98-1 500 500 http://mirror.grifon.fr/debian buster/main amd64 Packages 4.19.67-2+deb10u2 500 500 http://mirror.grifon.fr/debian-security buster/updates/main amd64 Packages root@hv03:~# Regards, -- Alarig