From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=rfvG=5L=vger.kernel.org=netdev-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BE4C2D0E8
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:04:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A222720737
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:04:58 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="b+fVkMlm"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727967AbgCZPE6 (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:04:58 -0400
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:59508 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1727495AbgCZPE5 (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:04:57 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch;
        s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:
        Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
        Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
        :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
        List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
        bh=6dRAIG31Y9o9lqNsoig/7hXppm0i32H4kRh/mHoRuKc=; b=b+fVkMlmKKb6o3MPVGwdzyhdFD
        6iY2dtR6MSMk7K3C9gHexE4R3rwOxVe2bqGEbcSqnvSYgjRlJIHx4Eo4e7vjHEHYmSibp2lCg2meq
        lqcBG0kli+PzfRQM5kFUtR9JO+1MaQiLFFQ3r4fs5UmlyoxojPqftN02QUk0PBZfjtWs=;
Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93)
        (envelope-from <andrew@lunn.ch>)
        id 1jHU3o-0000MQ-Gl; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:04:44 +0100
Date:   Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:04:44 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] split phylink PCS operations and add PCS
 support for dpaa2
Message-ID: <20200326150444.GH27427@lunn.ch>
References: <20200317144944.GP25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <20200326145750.GA25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200326145750.GA25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 02:57:50PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Was there any conclusion on this 5 patch series, and whether I should
> submit it for net-next?

Hi Russell

The basic idea seems sound. So i suggest re-submitting without the RFC
tag, and let people comment on it again.

     Andrew