From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2186DC5519B for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD1C2084D for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 05:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726504AbgD0Ffs (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 01:35:48 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:45443 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726178AbgD0Ffs (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Apr 2020 01:35:48 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 009A668CEE; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:35:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 07:35:45 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Kees Cook , Iurii Zaikin , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pass kernel pointers to the sysctl ->proc_handler method v3 Message-ID: <20200427053545.GB15905@lst.de> References: <20200424064338.538313-1-hch@lst.de> <20200426155100.bcbqnrilk45ugzva@ast-mbp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200426155100.bcbqnrilk45ugzva@ast-mbp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 08:51:00AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > The set looks good to me. > Should I take it via bpf-next tree ? The first patch is a little unrelated and I think taking it via the bpf tree sounds fine. Al volunteered the vfs tree for the actual sysctl changes, which looks more suitable.