netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vivien.didelot@gmail.com
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, jiri@mellanox.com,
	idosch@idosch.org, rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 04/15] net: dsa: sja1105: deny alterations of dsa_8021q VLANs from the bridge
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 20:20:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200512172039.14136-5-olteanv@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512172039.14136-1-olteanv@gmail.com>

From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>

At the moment, this can never happen. The 2 modes that we operate in do
not permit that:

 - SJA1105_VLAN_UNAWARE: we are guarded from bridge VLANs added by the
   user by the DSA core. We will later lift this restriction by setting
   ds->vlan_bridge_vtu = true, and that is where we'll need it.

 - SJA1105_VLAN_FILTERING_FULL: in this mode, dsa_8021q configuration is
   disabled. So the user is free to add these VLANs in the 1024-3071
   range.

The reason for the patch is that we'll introduce a third VLAN awareness
state, where both dsa_8021q as well as the bridge are going to call our
.port_vlan_add and .port_vlan_del methods.

For that, we need a good way to discriminate between the 2. The easiest
(and less intrusive way for upper layers) is to recognize the fact that
dsa_8021q configurations are always driven by our driver - we _know_
when a .port_vlan_add method will be called from dsa_8021q because _we_
initiated it.

So introduce an expect_dsa_8021q boolean which is only used, at the
moment, for blacklisting VLANs in range 1024-3071 in the modes when
dsa_8021q is active.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
---
Changes in v3:
None.

Changes in v2:
None.

 drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105.h      |  1 +
 drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105.h b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105.h
index 5b2b275d01a7..667056d0c819 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105.h
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105.h
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ struct sja1105_private {
 	 * the switch doesn't confuse them with one another.
 	 */
 	struct mutex mgmt_lock;
+	bool expect_dsa_8021q;
 	enum sja1105_vlan_state vlan_state;
 	struct sja1105_tagger_data tagger_data;
 	struct sja1105_ptp_data ptp_data;
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
index e7b675909288..8e68adba9144 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
@@ -1811,15 +1811,19 @@ static int sja1105_crosschip_bridge_join(struct dsa_switch *ds,
 		if (dsa_to_port(ds, port)->bridge_dev != br)
 			continue;
 
+		other_priv->expect_dsa_8021q = true;
 		rc = dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join(ds, port, other_ds,
 						     other_port, br,
 						     &priv->crosschip_links);
+		other_priv->expect_dsa_8021q = false;
 		if (rc)
 			return rc;
 
+		priv->expect_dsa_8021q = true;
 		rc = dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_join(other_ds, other_port, ds,
 						     port, br,
 						     &other_priv->crosschip_links);
+		priv->expect_dsa_8021q = false;
 		if (rc)
 			return rc;
 	}
@@ -1846,12 +1850,16 @@ static void sja1105_crosschip_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds,
 		if (dsa_to_port(ds, port)->bridge_dev != br)
 			continue;
 
+		other_priv->expect_dsa_8021q = true;
 		dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_leave(ds, port, other_ds, other_port,
 						 br, &priv->crosschip_links);
+		other_priv->expect_dsa_8021q = false;
 
+		priv->expect_dsa_8021q = true;
 		dsa_8021q_crosschip_bridge_leave(other_ds, other_port, ds,
 						 port, br,
 						 &other_priv->crosschip_links);
+		priv->expect_dsa_8021q = false;
 	}
 }
 
@@ -1862,8 +1870,10 @@ static int sja1105_replay_crosschip_vlans(struct dsa_switch *ds, bool enabled)
 	int rc;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(c, &priv->crosschip_links, list) {
+		priv->expect_dsa_8021q = true;
 		rc = dsa_8021q_crosschip_link_apply(ds, c->port, c->other_ds,
 						    c->other_port, enabled);
+		priv->expect_dsa_8021q = false;
 		if (rc)
 			break;
 	}
@@ -1873,10 +1883,13 @@ static int sja1105_replay_crosschip_vlans(struct dsa_switch *ds, bool enabled)
 
 static int sja1105_setup_8021q_tagging(struct dsa_switch *ds, bool enabled)
 {
+	struct sja1105_private *priv = ds->priv;
 	int rc, i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < SJA1105_NUM_PORTS; i++) {
+		priv->expect_dsa_8021q = true;
 		rc = dsa_port_setup_8021q_tagging(ds, i, enabled);
+		priv->expect_dsa_8021q = false;
 		if (rc < 0) {
 			dev_err(ds->dev, "Failed to setup VLAN tagging for port %d: %d\n",
 				i, rc);
@@ -1901,10 +1914,26 @@ sja1105_get_tag_protocol(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
 	return DSA_TAG_PROTO_SJA1105;
 }
 
-/* This callback needs to be present */
 static int sja1105_vlan_prepare(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
 				const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *vlan)
 {
+	struct sja1105_private *priv = ds->priv;
+	u16 vid;
+
+	if (priv->vlan_state == SJA1105_VLAN_FILTERING_FULL)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* If the user wants best-effort VLAN filtering (aka vlan_filtering
+	 * bridge plus tagging), be sure to at least deny alterations to the
+	 * configuration done by dsa_8021q.
+	 */
+	for (vid = vlan->vid_begin; vid <= vlan->vid_end; vid++) {
+		if (!priv->expect_dsa_8021q && vid_is_dsa_8021q(vid)) {
+			dev_err(ds->dev, "Range 1024-3071 reserved for dsa_8021q operation\n");
+			return -EBUSY;
+		}
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-12 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-12 17:20 [PATCH v3 net-next 00/15] Traffic support for dsa_8021q in vlan_filtering=1 mode Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 01/15] net: dsa: provide an option for drivers to always receive bridge VLANs Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 02/15] net: dsa: tag_8021q: introduce a vid_is_dsa_8021q helper Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 03/15] net: dsa: sja1105: keep the VLAN awareness state in a driver variable Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 05/15] net: dsa: sja1105: save/restore VLANs using a delta commit method Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 06/15] net: dsa: sja1105: allow VLAN configuration from the bridge in all states Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 07/15] net: dsa: sja1105: exit sja1105_vlan_filtering when called multiple times Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 08/15] net: dsa: sja1105: prepare tagger for handling DSA tags and VLAN simultaneously Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-13  0:02   ` kbuild test robot
2020-05-13  0:08     ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 09/15] net: dsa: tag_8021q: support up to 8 VLANs per port using sub-VLANs Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 10/15] net: dsa: tag_sja1105: implement sub-VLAN decoding Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 11/15] net: dsa: sja1105: add a new best_effort_vlan_filtering devlink parameter Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 12/15] net: dsa: sja1105: add packing ops for the Retagging Table Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 13/15] net: dsa: sja1105: implement a common frame memory partitioning function Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 14/15] net: dsa: sja1105: implement VLAN retagging for dsa_8021q sub-VLANs Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 17:20 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 15/15] docs: net: dsa: sja1105: document the best_effort_vlan_filtering option Vladimir Oltean
2020-05-12 20:10 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 00/15] Traffic support for dsa_8021q in vlan_filtering=1 mode David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200512172039.14136-5-olteanv@gmail.com \
    --to=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).