From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7FFC433E0 for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 08:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88E05207FB for ; Tue, 19 May 2020 08:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728277AbgESIx5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 04:53:57 -0400 Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:57844 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726369AbgESIx5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 May 2020 04:53:57 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB212052E; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:53:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by secunet Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (a.mx.secunet.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LO34DyIrttZN; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:53:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cas-essen-02.secunet.de (202.40.53.10.in-addr.arpa [10.53.40.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a.mx.secunet.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA08B200A3; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:53:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) by cas-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:53:54 +0200 Received: from gauss2.secunet.de (10.182.7.193) by mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:53:54 +0200 Received: by gauss2.secunet.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CAC3A3180167; Tue, 19 May 2020 10:53:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:53:53 +0200 From: Steffen Klassert To: Yuehaibing CC: , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfrm: policy: Fix xfrm policy match Message-ID: <20200519085353.GE13121@gauss3.secunet.de> References: <20200421143149.45108-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <20200422125346.27756-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> <0015ec4c-0e9c-a9d2-eb03-4d51c5fbbe86@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0015ec4c-0e9c-a9d2-eb03-4d51c5fbbe86@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-ClientProxiedBy: cas-essen-02.secunet.de (10.53.40.202) To mbx-essen-01.secunet.de (10.53.40.197) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 2c86f778-e09b-4440-8b15-867914633a10 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 04:39:57PM +0800, Yuehaibing wrote: > > Friendly ping... > > Any plan for this issue? There was still no consensus between you and Xin on how to fix this issue. Once this happens, I consider applying a fix.