From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, nhorman@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com,
Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: [net-next 11/17] igc: Change adapter->nfc_rule_lock to mutex
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 19:51:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200523025109.3313635-12-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200523025109.3313635-1-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
From: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
This patch changes adapter->nfc_rule_lock type from spin_lock to mutex
so we avoid unnecessary busy waiting on lock contention.
A closer look at the execution context of NFC rule API users shows that
all of them run in process context. The API users are: ethtool ops,
igc_configure(), called when interface is brought up by user or reset
workequeue thread, igc_down(), called when interface is brought down,
and igc_remove(), called when driver is unloaded.
Signed-off-by: Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h | 2 +-
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c | 24 ++++++++++----------
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 14 ++++++------
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
index a484b328268b..14f9edaaaf83 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ struct igc_adapter {
/* Any access to elements in nfc_rule_list is protected by the
* nfc_rule_lock.
*/
- spinlock_t nfc_rule_lock;
+ struct mutex nfc_rule_lock;
struct list_head nfc_rule_list;
unsigned int nfc_rule_count;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c
index d14c46dce053..946e775e34ae 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_ethtool.c
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ static int igc_ethtool_get_nfc_rule(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
cmd->data = IGC_MAX_RXNFC_RULES;
- spin_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
rule = igc_get_nfc_rule(adapter, fsp->location);
if (!rule)
@@ -971,11 +971,11 @@ static int igc_ethtool_get_nfc_rule(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
eth_broadcast_addr(fsp->m_u.ether_spec.h_source);
}
- spin_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
return 0;
out:
- spin_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -988,18 +988,18 @@ static int igc_ethtool_get_nfc_rules(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
cmd->data = IGC_MAX_RXNFC_RULES;
- spin_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
list_for_each_entry(rule, &adapter->nfc_rule_list, list) {
if (cnt == cmd->rule_cnt) {
- spin_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
return -EMSGSIZE;
}
rule_locs[cnt] = rule->location;
cnt++;
}
- spin_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
cmd->rule_cnt = cnt;
@@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ static int igc_ethtool_add_nfc_rule(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
igc_ethtool_init_nfc_rule(rule, fsp);
- spin_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
err = igc_ethtool_check_nfc_rule(adapter, rule);
if (err)
@@ -1317,11 +1317,11 @@ static int igc_ethtool_add_nfc_rule(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
if (err)
goto err;
- spin_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
return 0;
err:
- spin_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
kfree(rule);
return err;
}
@@ -1333,17 +1333,17 @@ static int igc_ethtool_del_nfc_rule(struct igc_adapter *adapter,
(struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec *)&cmd->fs;
struct igc_nfc_rule *rule;
- spin_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
rule = igc_get_nfc_rule(adapter, fsp->location);
if (!rule) {
- spin_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
return -EINVAL;
}
igc_del_nfc_rule(adapter, rule);
- spin_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
index 9338209cedf2..165263ae8add 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
@@ -2539,12 +2539,12 @@ static void igc_flush_nfc_rules(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
{
struct igc_nfc_rule *rule, *tmp;
- spin_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(rule, tmp, &adapter->nfc_rule_list, list)
igc_del_nfc_rule(adapter, rule);
- spin_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
}
/**
@@ -2583,24 +2583,24 @@ static void igc_restore_nfc_rules(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
{
struct igc_nfc_rule *rule;
- spin_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(rule, &adapter->nfc_rule_list, list)
igc_enable_nfc_rule(adapter, rule);
- spin_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
}
static void igc_nfc_rule_exit(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
{
struct igc_nfc_rule *rule;
- spin_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_lock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
list_for_each_entry(rule, &adapter->nfc_rule_list, list)
igc_disable_nfc_rule(adapter, rule);
- spin_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
}
static int igc_uc_sync(struct net_device *netdev, const unsigned char *addr)
@@ -3573,7 +3573,7 @@ static int igc_sw_init(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
VLAN_HLEN;
adapter->min_frame_size = ETH_ZLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN;
- spin_lock_init(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
+ mutex_init(&adapter->nfc_rule_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&adapter->nfc_rule_list);
adapter->nfc_rule_count = 0;
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-23 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-23 2:50 [net-next 00/17][pull request] 1GbE Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2020-05-22 Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 01/17] igc: Refactor igc_ethtool_add_nfc_rule() Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 02/17] igc: Fix 'sw_idx' type in struct igc_nfc_rule Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 03/17] igc: Fix locking issue when retrieving NFC rules Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 04/17] igc: Fix NFC rule overwrite cases Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 05/17] igc: Fix NFC rules with multicast addresses Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 06/17] igc: Fix NFC rules restoration Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:50 ` [net-next 07/17] igc: Refactor igc_ethtool_update_nfc_rule() Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 08/17] igc: Fix NFC rules leak when driver is unloaded Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 09/17] igc: Fix NFC rule validation Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 10/17] igc: Change return type from igc_disable_nfc_rule() Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 12/17] igc: Remove igc_nfc_rule_exit() Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 13/17] igc: Remove unused descriptor's flags Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 14/17] igb: Report speed and duplex as unknown when device is runtime suspended Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 15/17] e1000e: Warn if disabling ULP failed Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 16/17] e1000e: Disable TSO for buffer overrun workaround Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 2:51 ` [net-next 17/17] e1000e: disable s0ix entry and exit flows for ME systems Jeff Kirsher
2020-05-23 23:48 ` [net-next 00/17][pull request] 1GbE Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates 2020-05-22 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200523025109.3313635-12-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=aaron.f.brown@intel.com \
--cc=andre.guedes@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).