From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@dlink.ru>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>,
Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: core: use listified Rx for GRO_NORMAL in napi_gro_receive()
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 15:06:06 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200624210606.GA1362687@zx2c4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191014080033.12407-1-alobakin@dlink.ru>
Hi Alexander,
This patch introduced a behavior change around GRO_DROP:
napi_skb_finish used to sometimes return GRO_DROP:
> -static gro_result_t napi_skb_finish(gro_result_t ret, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +static gro_result_t napi_skb_finish(struct napi_struct *napi,
> + struct sk_buff *skb,
> + gro_result_t ret)
> {
> switch (ret) {
> case GRO_NORMAL:
> - if (netif_receive_skb_internal(skb))
> - ret = GRO_DROP;
> + gro_normal_one(napi, skb);
>
But under your change, gro_normal_one and the various calls that makes
never propagates its return value, and so GRO_DROP is never returned to
the caller, even if something drops it.
Was this intentional? Or should I start looking into how to restore it?
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-24 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-14 8:00 [PATCH v2 net-next] net: core: use listified Rx for GRO_NORMAL in napi_gro_receive() Alexander Lobakin
2019-10-16 1:16 ` David Miller
2019-10-16 7:31 ` Alexander Lobakin
2019-11-25 7:29 ` Nicholas Johnson
2019-11-25 7:54 ` Alexander Lobakin
2019-11-25 8:25 ` Alexander Lobakin
2019-11-25 9:09 ` Nicholas Johnson
2019-11-25 10:31 ` Edward Cree
2019-11-25 10:58 ` Alexander Lobakin
2019-11-25 11:05 ` Johannes Berg
2019-11-25 11:42 ` Paolo Abeni
2019-11-25 12:02 ` Alexander Lobakin
2019-11-25 13:21 ` Edward Cree
2019-11-25 13:39 ` Alexander Lobakin
2019-11-26 23:57 ` David Miller
2019-11-27 7:47 ` Alexander Lobakin
2019-11-27 8:30 ` Johannes Berg
2019-11-27 9:47 ` Alexander Lobakin
2019-11-25 12:11 ` Kalle Valo
2019-11-25 13:07 ` Nicholas Johnson
2019-11-25 13:11 ` Nicholas Johnson
2020-06-24 21:06 ` Jason A. Donenfeld [this message]
2020-06-24 21:28 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2020-06-25 14:25 ` Edward Cree
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200624210606.GA1362687@zx2c4.com \
--to=jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=alobakin@dlink.ru \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ecree@solarflare.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@mellanox.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).