From: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 14/16] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for bpf_sk_lookup context access
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:24:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200702092416.11961-15-jakub@cloudflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200702092416.11961-1-jakub@cloudflare.com>
Exercise verifier access checks for bpf_sk_lookup context fields.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
---
Notes:
v3:
- Consolidate ACCEPT tests into one.
- Deduplicate REJECT tests and arrange them into logical groups.
- Add tests for out-of-bounds and unaligned access.
- Cover access to newly introduced 'sk' field.
v2:
- Adjust for fields renames in struct bpf_sk_lookup.
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c | 219 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 219 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9542b07892ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/ctx_sk_lookup.c
@@ -0,0 +1,219 @@
+{
+ "valid 4-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup",
+ .insns = {
+ /* 4-byte read from family field */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, family)),
+ /* 4-byte read from protocol field */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, protocol)),
+ /* 4-byte read from remote_ip4 field */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, remote_ip4)),
+ /* 4-byte read from remote_ip6 field */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, remote_ip6[0])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, remote_ip6[1])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, remote_ip6[2])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, remote_ip6[3])),
+ /* 4-byte read from remote_port field */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, remote_port)),
+ /* 4-byte read from local_ip4 field */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, local_ip4)),
+ /* 4-byte read from local_ip6 field */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, local_ip6[0])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, local_ip6[1])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, local_ip6[2])),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, local_ip6[3])),
+ /* 4-byte read from local_port field */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, local_port)),
+ /* 8-byte read from sk field */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, sk)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+/* invalid size reads from a 4-byte field in bpf_sk_lookup */
+{
+ "invalid 8-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup family field",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, family)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+{
+ "invalid 2-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup family field",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, family)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+{
+ "invalid 1-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup family field",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, family)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+/* invalid size reads from an 8-byte field in bpf_sk_lookup */
+{
+ "invalid 4-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup sk field",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, sk)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+{
+ "invalid 2-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup sk field",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, sk)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+{
+ "invalid 1-byte read from bpf_sk_lookup sk field",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ offsetof(struct bpf_sk_lookup, sk)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+/* out of bounds and unaligned reads from bpf_sk_lookup */
+{
+ "invalid 4-byte read past end of bpf_sk_lookup",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
+ sizeof(struct bpf_sk_lookup)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+{
+ "invalid 4-byte unaligned read from bpf_sk_lookup at odd offset",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+{
+ "invalid 4-byte unaligned read from bpf_sk_lookup at even offset",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 2),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+/* writes to and out of bounds of bpf_sk_lookup */
+{
+ "invalid 8-byte write to bpf_sk_lookup",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0xcafe4a11U),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+{
+ "invalid 4-byte write to bpf_sk_lookup",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0xcafe4a11U),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+{
+ "invalid 2-byte write to bpf_sk_lookup",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0xcafe4a11U),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+{
+ "invalid 1-byte write to bpf_sk_lookup",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0xcafe4a11U),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
+{
+ "invalid 4-byte write past end of bpf_sk_lookup",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0xcafe4a11U),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0,
+ sizeof(struct bpf_sk_lookup)),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
+ .expected_attach_type = BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
+},
--
2.25.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-02 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-07-02 9:24 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/16] Run a BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/16] bpf, netns: Handle multiple link attachments Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 3:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-09 12:49 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 22:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-10 19:23 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/16] bpf: Introduce SK_LOOKUP program type with a dedicated attach point Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-04 18:42 ` Yonghong Song
2020-07-06 11:44 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-05 9:20 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-05 9:20 ` [RFC PATCH] bpf: sk_lookup_prog_ops can be static kernel test robot
2020-07-07 9:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/16] bpf: Introduce SK_LOOKUP program type with a dedicated attach point Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 4:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-09 13:25 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 23:09 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-10 8:55 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/16] inet: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/16] inet: Run SK_LOOKUP BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 10:27 ` Lorenz Bauer
2020-07-02 12:46 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 13:19 ` Lorenz Bauer
2020-07-06 11:24 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-06 12:06 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/16] inet6: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/16] inet6: Run SK_LOOKUP BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/16] udp: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/16] udp: Run SK_LOOKUP BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/16] udp6: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/16] udp6: Run SK_LOOKUP BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 14:51 ` kernel test robot
2020-07-03 13:04 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 11/16] bpf: Sync linux/bpf.h to tools/ Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 12/16] libbpf: Add support for SK_LOOKUP program type Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 4:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-09 15:51 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 23:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-10 8:37 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-10 18:55 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-10 19:24 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 13/16] tools/bpftool: Add name mappings for SK_LOOKUP prog and attach type Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` Jakub Sitnicki [this message]
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 15/16] selftests/bpf: Rename test_sk_lookup_kern.c to test_ref_track_kern.c Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 9:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 16/16] selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 11:01 ` Lorenz Bauer
2020-07-02 12:59 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-09 4:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-07-09 15:54 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-07-02 11:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/16] Run a BPF program on socket lookup Lorenz Bauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200702092416.11961-15-jakub@cloudflare.com \
--to=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).