From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
ast@kernel.org, brouer@redhat.com, toke@redhat.com,
lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org,
andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 5/9] bpf: cpumap: add the possibility to attach an eBPF program to cpumap
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 17:46:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200703154628.GA1321275@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb2f7b80-7c0f-4f96-6285-87cc615c7484@iogearbox.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2334 bytes --]
> On 6/30/20 2:49 PM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> [...]
[...]
> > + prog = READ_ONCE(rcpu->prog);
>
> What purpose does the READ_ONCE() have here, also given you don't use it in above check?
> Since upon map update you realloc, repopulate and then xchg() the rcpu entry itself, there
> is never the case where you xchg() or WRITE_ONCE() the rcpu->prog, so what does READ_ONCE()
> serve in this context? Imho, it should probably just be deleted and plain rcpu->prog used
> to avoid confusion.
Hi Daniel,
ack, I will fix it in v6
>
> > + for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> > + struct xdp_frame *xdpf = frames[i];
> > + u32 act;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + rxq.dev = xdpf->dev_rx;
> > + rxq.mem = xdpf->mem;
> > + /* TODO: report queue_index to xdp_rxq_info */
> > +
> > + xdp_convert_frame_to_buff(xdpf, &xdp);
> > +
> > + act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(prog, &xdp);
> > + switch (act) {
> > + case XDP_PASS:
> > + err = xdp_update_frame_from_buff(&xdp, xdpf);
> > + if (err < 0) {
> > + xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
> > + stats->drop++;
> > + } else {
> > + frames[nframes++] = xdpf;
> > + stats->pass++;
> > + }
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action(act);
> > + /* fallthrough */
> > + case XDP_DROP:
> > + xdp_return_frame(xdpf);
> > + stats->drop++;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + xdp_clear_return_frame_no_direct();
> > +
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > + return nframes;
> > +}
> [...]
> > +bool cpu_map_prog_allowed(struct bpf_map *map)
> > +{
> > + return map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_CPUMAP &&
> > + map->value_size != offsetofend(struct bpf_cpumap_val, qsize);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __cpu_map_load_bpf_program(struct bpf_cpu_map_entry *rcpu, int fd)
> > +{
> > + struct bpf_prog *prog;
> > +
> > + prog = bpf_prog_get_type_dev(fd, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, false);
>
> Nit: why the _dev variant; just use bpf_prog_get_type()?
ack, I will fix in v6
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> > + if (IS_ERR(prog))
> > + return PTR_ERR(prog);
> > +
> > + if (prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_XDP_CPUMAP) {
> > + bpf_prog_put(prog);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + rcpu->value.bpf_prog.id = prog->aux->id;
> > + rcpu->prog = prog;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-03 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-30 12:49 [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/9] introduce support for XDP programs in CPUMAP Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-30 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 1/9] cpumap: use non-locked version __ptr_ring_consume_batched Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-30 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 2/9] net: refactor xdp_convert_buff_to_frame Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-30 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 3/9] samples/bpf: xdp_redirect_cpu_user: do not update bpf maps in option loop Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-30 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 4/9] cpumap: formalize map value as a named struct Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-30 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 5/9] bpf: cpumap: add the possibility to attach an eBPF program to cpumap Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-07-01 23:02 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-07-03 15:46 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2020-07-01 23:39 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-07-03 20:48 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-07-03 22:24 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-06-30 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 6/9] bpf: cpumap: implement XDP_REDIRECT for eBPF programs attached to map entries Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-30 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 7/9] libbpf: add SEC name for xdp programs attached to CPUMAP Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-30 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 8/9] samples/bpf: xdp_redirect_cpu: load a eBPF program on cpumap Lorenzo Bianconi
2020-06-30 12:49 ` [PATCH v5 bpf-next 9/9] selftest: add tests for XDP programs in CPUMAP entries Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200703154628.GA1321275@localhost.localdomain \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).