From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2FCC433E0 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D41B20773 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:16:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1594131378; bh=ysSKE2uB/6vITWzGT/RAPH4Pi6/54GSo2L77diI9b8A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=wKSy+6hpTHPNHF71cpvxECWX6CVW6YdmU7xqvjFEHgpH6l7bH8JTElsTTZ/IYoCgo yJwUKgOvkjbSLjNZdkPmjxk3F1prRMFIoLeYRYjUTyDI3gOM0TcAFJJQX2YDFRhILA e9RmWeoWziniB2v3vKh82giaAhWsxFB4GBDxmndE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727995AbgGGOQR (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 10:16:17 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50880 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726805AbgGGOQR (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jul 2020 10:16:17 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FD3B206E2; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 14:16:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1594131376; bh=ysSKE2uB/6vITWzGT/RAPH4Pi6/54GSo2L77diI9b8A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=wWZpKJDp3qP4kv081Iums/NwSMEB3F3WcU0qhNoZpScVwyxHC4ykicwjmZbg1kYe0 G00WOEHsoSu+fMkNMqk++5Gyrl+cDQ2X9A8P5M2OOv/j3szFmpsJACEgM4D24zhDBf ebS469uKP+ZaAiMj6lWqx9GhRxXO5iyDOO1BjKCM= Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 16:16:14 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Dan Williams Cc: Ranjani Sridharan , Jason Gunthorpe , Mark Brown , Takashi Iwai , Pierre-Louis Bossart , Jeff Kirsher , David Miller , Netdev , linux-rdma , nhorman@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com, Fred Oh , lee.jones@linaro.org Subject: Re: [net-next v4 10/12] ASoC: SOF: Introduce descriptors for SOF client Message-ID: <20200707141614.GC54123@kroah.com> References: <20200527071733.GB52617@kroah.com> <20200629203317.GM5499@sirena.org.uk> <20200629225959.GF25301@ziepe.ca> <20200630103141.GA5272@sirena.org.uk> <20200630113245.GG25301@ziepe.ca> <936d8b1cbd7a598327e1b247441fa055d7083cb6.camel@linux.intel.com> <20200701065915.GF2044019@kroah.com> <8b88749c197f07c7c70273614dd6ee8840b2b14d.camel@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 04:02:57PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 6:44 AM Ranjani Sridharan > wrote: > [..] > > > > Hi Jason, > > > > > > > > We're addressing the naming in the next version as well. We've had > > > > several people reject the name virtual bus and we've narrowed in on > > > > "ancillary bus" for the new name suggesting that we have the core > > > > device that is attached to the primary bus and one or more sub- > > > > devices > > > > that are attached to the ancillary bus. Please let us know what you > > > > think of it. > > > > > > I'm thinking that the primary person who keeps asking you to create > > > this > > > "virtual bus" was not upset about that name, nor consulted, so why > > > are > > > you changing this? :( > > > > > > Right now this feels like the old technique of "keep throwing crap at > > > a > > > maintainer until they get so sick of it that they do the work > > > themselves..." > > > > Hi Greg, > > > > It wasnt our intention to frustrate you with the name change but in the > > last exchange you had specifically asked for signed-off-by's from other > > Intel developers. In that process, one of the recent feedback from some > > of them was about the name being misleading and confusing. > > > > If you feel strongly about the keeping name "virtual bus", please let > > us know and we can circle back with them again. > > Hey Greg, > > Feel free to blame me for the naming thrash it was part of my internal > review feedback trying to crispen the definition of this facility. I > was expecting the next revision to come with the internal reviewed-by > and an explanation of all the items that were changed during that > review. That would have been nice to see, instead of it "leaking" like this :( thanks, greg k-h