netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [net-next PATCH 0/2 v6] RTL8366RB tagging support
@ 2020-07-08 12:25 Linus Walleij
  2020-07-08 12:25 ` [net-next PATCH 1/2 v6] net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Implement Realtek 4 byte A tag Linus Walleij
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2020-07-08 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Lunn, Vivien Didelot, Florian Fainelli, netdev, David S . Miller
  Cc: Linus Walleij

This patch set adds DSA tagging support to the RTL8366RB
DSA driver.

There is a minor performance improvement in the tag parser
compared to the previous patch set and the review tags
have been collected.

Linus Walleij (2):
  net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Implement Realtek 4 byte A tag
  net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Support the CPU DSA tag

 drivers/net/dsa/Kconfig     |   1 +
 drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c |  31 +++------
 include/net/dsa.h           |   2 +
 net/dsa/Kconfig             |   7 ++
 net/dsa/Makefile            |   1 +
 net/dsa/tag_rtl4_a.c        | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 6 files changed, 149 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 net/dsa/tag_rtl4_a.c

-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [net-next PATCH 1/2 v6] net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Implement Realtek 4 byte A tag
  2020-07-08 12:25 [net-next PATCH 0/2 v6] RTL8366RB tagging support Linus Walleij
@ 2020-07-08 12:25 ` Linus Walleij
  2020-07-08 12:25 ` [net-next PATCH 2/2 v6] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Support the CPU DSA tag Linus Walleij
  2020-07-08 22:36 ` [net-next PATCH 0/2 v6] RTL8366RB tagging support David Miller
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2020-07-08 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Lunn, Vivien Didelot, Florian Fainelli, netdev, David S . Miller
  Cc: Linus Walleij, DENG Qingfang, Mauri Sandberg

This implements the known parts of the Realtek 4 byte
tag protocol version 0xA, as found in the RTL8366RB
DSA switch.

It is designated as protocol version 0xA as a
different Realtek 4 byte tag format with protocol
version 0x9 is known to exist in the Realtek RTL8306
chips.

The tag and switch chip lacks public documentation, so
the tag format has been reverse-engineered from
packet dumps. As only ingress traffic has been available
for analysis an egress tag has not been possible to
develop (even using educated guesses about bit fields)
so this is as far as it gets. It is not known if the
switch even supports egress tagging.

Excessive attempts to figure out the egress tag format
was made. When nothing else worked, I just tried all bit
combinations with 0xannp where a is protocol and p is
port. I looped through all values several times trying
to get a response from ping, without any positive
result.

Using just these ingress tags however, the switch
functionality is vastly improved and the packets find
their way into the destination port without any
tricky VLAN configuration. On the D-Link DIR-685 the
LAN ports now come up and respond to ping without
any command line configuration so this is a real
improvement for users.

Egress packets need to be restricted to the proper
target ports using VLAN, which the RTL8366RB DSA
switch driver already sets up.

Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
ChangeLog v5->v6:
- Fix the lookup for port on incoming packets to be
  done before any packet rewrite happens so we don't
  waste cycles.
- Collect Florian's review tag.
ChangeLog v4->v5:
- Split tagging support from the VLAN fix-ups.
ChangeLog v3->v4:
- Drop an unused variable found with -Wunused-variable
ChangeLog v2->v3:
- Collect Andrew's review tag.
ChangeLog v1->v2:
- Drop some netdev_dbg() calls that was just littering.
- Rebase on v5.8-rc1
---
 include/net/dsa.h    |   2 +
 net/dsa/Kconfig      |   7 +++
 net/dsa/Makefile     |   1 +
 net/dsa/tag_rtl4_a.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 140 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 net/dsa/tag_rtl4_a.c

diff --git a/include/net/dsa.h b/include/net/dsa.h
index 50389772c597..2b37943f09a4 100644
--- a/include/net/dsa.h
+++ b/include/net/dsa.h
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ struct phylink_link_state;
 #define DSA_TAG_PROTO_KSZ8795_VALUE		14
 #define DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT_VALUE		15
 #define DSA_TAG_PROTO_AR9331_VALUE		16
+#define DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL4_A_VALUE		17
 
 enum dsa_tag_protocol {
 	DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE		= DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE_VALUE,
@@ -63,6 +64,7 @@ enum dsa_tag_protocol {
 	DSA_TAG_PROTO_KSZ8795		= DSA_TAG_PROTO_KSZ8795_VALUE,
 	DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT		= DSA_TAG_PROTO_OCELOT_VALUE,
 	DSA_TAG_PROTO_AR9331		= DSA_TAG_PROTO_AR9331_VALUE,
+	DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL4_A		= DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL4_A_VALUE,
 };
 
 struct packet_type;
diff --git a/net/dsa/Kconfig b/net/dsa/Kconfig
index d5bc6ac599ef..1f9b9b11008c 100644
--- a/net/dsa/Kconfig
+++ b/net/dsa/Kconfig
@@ -86,6 +86,13 @@ config NET_DSA_TAG_KSZ
 	  Say Y if you want to enable support for tagging frames for the
 	  Microchip 8795/9477/9893 families of switches.
 
+config NET_DSA_TAG_RTL4_A
+	tristate "Tag driver for Realtek 4 byte protocol A tags"
+	help
+	  Say Y or M if you want to enable support for tagging frames for the
+	  Realtek switches with 4 byte protocol A tags, sich as found in
+	  the Realtek RTL8366RB.
+
 config NET_DSA_TAG_OCELOT
 	tristate "Tag driver for Ocelot family of switches"
 	select PACKING
diff --git a/net/dsa/Makefile b/net/dsa/Makefile
index 108486cfdeef..4f47b2025ff5 100644
--- a/net/dsa/Makefile
+++ b/net/dsa/Makefile
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_DSA) += tag_dsa.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_EDSA) += tag_edsa.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_GSWIP) += tag_gswip.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_KSZ) += tag_ksz.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_RTL4_A) += tag_rtl4_a.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_LAN9303) += tag_lan9303.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_MTK) += tag_mtk.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_NET_DSA_TAG_OCELOT) += tag_ocelot.o
diff --git a/net/dsa/tag_rtl4_a.c b/net/dsa/tag_rtl4_a.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..7b63010fa87b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/dsa/tag_rtl4_a.c
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Handler for Realtek 4 byte DSA switch tags
+ * Currently only supports protocol "A" found in RTL8366RB
+ * Copyright (c) 2020 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
+ *
+ * This "proprietary tag" header looks like so:
+ *
+ * -------------------------------------------------
+ * | MAC DA | MAC SA | 0x8899 | 2 bytes tag | Type |
+ * -------------------------------------------------
+ *
+ * The 2 bytes tag form a 16 bit big endian word. The exact
+ * meaning has been guessed from packet dumps from ingress
+ * frames, as no working egress traffic has been available
+ * we do not know the format of the egress tags or if they
+ * are even supported.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/etherdevice.h>
+#include <linux/bits.h>
+
+#include "dsa_priv.h"
+
+#define RTL4_A_HDR_LEN		4
+#define RTL4_A_ETHERTYPE	0x8899
+#define RTL4_A_PROTOCOL_SHIFT	12
+/*
+ * 0x1 = Realtek Remote Control protocol (RRCP)
+ * 0x2/0x3 seems to be used for loopback testing
+ * 0x9 = RTL8306 DSA protocol
+ * 0xa = RTL8366RB DSA protocol
+ */
+#define RTL4_A_PROTOCOL_RTL8366RB	0xa
+
+static struct sk_buff *rtl4a_tag_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
+				      struct net_device *dev)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Just let it pass thru, we don't know if it is possible
+	 * to tag a frame with the 0x8899 ethertype and direct it
+	 * to a specific port, all attempts at reverse-engineering have
+	 * ended up with the frames getting dropped.
+	 *
+	 * The VLAN set-up needs to restrict the frames to the right port.
+	 *
+	 * If you have documentation on the tagging format for RTL8366RB
+	 * (tag type A) then please contribute.
+	 */
+	return skb;
+}
+
+static struct sk_buff *rtl4a_tag_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb,
+				     struct net_device *dev,
+				     struct packet_type *pt)
+{
+	u16 protport;
+	__be16 *p;
+	u16 etype;
+	u8 *tag;
+	u8 prot;
+	u8 port;
+
+	if (unlikely(!pskb_may_pull(skb, RTL4_A_HDR_LEN)))
+		return NULL;
+
+	/* The RTL4 header has its own custom Ethertype 0x8899 and that
+	 * starts right at the beginning of the packet, after the src
+	 * ethernet addr. Apparantly skb->data always points 2 bytes in,
+	 * behind the Ethertype.
+	 */
+	tag = skb->data - 2;
+	p = (__be16 *)tag;
+	etype = ntohs(*p);
+	if (etype != RTL4_A_ETHERTYPE) {
+		/* Not custom, just pass through */
+		netdev_dbg(dev, "non-realtek ethertype 0x%04x\n", etype);
+		return skb;
+	}
+	p = (__be16 *)(tag + 2);
+	protport = ntohs(*p);
+	/* The 4 upper bits are the protocol */
+	prot = (protport >> RTL4_A_PROTOCOL_SHIFT) & 0x0f;
+	if (prot != RTL4_A_PROTOCOL_RTL8366RB) {
+		netdev_err(dev, "unknown realtek protocol 0x%01x\n", prot);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+	port = protport & 0xff;
+
+	skb->dev = dsa_master_find_slave(dev, 0, port);
+	if (!skb->dev) {
+		netdev_dbg(dev, "could not find slave for port %d\n", port);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	/* Remove RTL4 tag and recalculate checksum */
+	skb_pull_rcsum(skb, RTL4_A_HDR_LEN);
+
+	/* Move ethernet DA and SA in front of the data */
+	memmove(skb->data - ETH_HLEN,
+		skb->data - ETH_HLEN - RTL4_A_HDR_LEN,
+		2 * ETH_ALEN);
+
+	skb->offload_fwd_mark = 1;
+
+	return skb;
+}
+
+static int rtl4a_tag_flow_dissect(const struct sk_buff *skb, __be16 *proto,
+				  int *offset)
+{
+	*offset = RTL4_A_HDR_LEN;
+	/* Skip past the tag and fetch the encapsulated Ethertype */
+	*proto = ((__be16 *)skb->data)[1];
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct dsa_device_ops rtl4a_netdev_ops = {
+	.name	= "rtl4a",
+	.proto	= DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL4_A,
+	.xmit	= rtl4a_tag_xmit,
+	.rcv	= rtl4a_tag_rcv,
+	.flow_dissect = rtl4a_tag_flow_dissect,
+	.overhead = RTL4_A_HDR_LEN,
+};
+module_dsa_tag_driver(rtl4a_netdev_ops);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_ALIAS_DSA_TAG_DRIVER(DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL4_A);
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [net-next PATCH 2/2 v6] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Support the CPU DSA tag
  2020-07-08 12:25 [net-next PATCH 0/2 v6] RTL8366RB tagging support Linus Walleij
  2020-07-08 12:25 ` [net-next PATCH 1/2 v6] net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Implement Realtek 4 byte A tag Linus Walleij
@ 2020-07-08 12:25 ` Linus Walleij
  2020-07-08 22:36 ` [net-next PATCH 0/2 v6] RTL8366RB tagging support David Miller
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2020-07-08 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Lunn, Vivien Didelot, Florian Fainelli, netdev, David S . Miller
  Cc: Linus Walleij, DENG Qingfang, Mauri Sandberg

This activates the support to use the CPU tag to properly
direct ingress traffic to the right port.

Bit 15 in register RTL8368RB_CPU_CTRL_REG can be set to
1 to disable the insertion of the CPU tag which is what
the code currently does. The bit 15 define calls this
setting RTL8368RB_CPU_INSTAG which is confusing since the
inverse meaning is implied: programmers may think that
setting this bit to 1 will *enable* inserting the tag
rather than disabling it, so rename this setting in
bit 15 to RTL8368RB_CPU_NO_TAG which is more to the
point.

After this e.g. ping works out-of-the-box with the
RTL8366RB.

Cc: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauri Sandberg <sandberg@mailfence.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
ChangeLog v5->v6:
- Collect Florian's review tag.
ChangeLog v4->v5:
- Split tagging support from the VLAN fix-ups.
ChangeLog v3->v4:
- Resend with the rest
ChangeLog v2->v3:
- Fix up the commit message.
- Collect Andrew's review tag.
ChangeLog v1->v2:
- Update the commit message to explain why we are renaming
  bit 15 in RTL8368RB_CPU_CTRL_REG.
---
 drivers/net/dsa/Kconfig     |  1 +
 drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c | 31 ++++++++-----------------------
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/Kconfig b/drivers/net/dsa/Kconfig
index d0024cb30a7b..468b3c4273c5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/Kconfig
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ config NET_DSA_QCA8K
 config NET_DSA_REALTEK_SMI
 	tristate "Realtek SMI Ethernet switch family support"
 	depends on NET_DSA
+	select NET_DSA_TAG_RTL4_A
 	select FIXED_PHY
 	select IRQ_DOMAIN
 	select REALTEK_PHY
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
index fd1977590cb4..48f1ff746799 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366rb.c
@@ -109,8 +109,8 @@
 /* CPU port control reg */
 #define RTL8368RB_CPU_CTRL_REG		0x0061
 #define RTL8368RB_CPU_PORTS_MSK		0x00FF
-/* Enables inserting custom tag length/type 0x8899 */
-#define RTL8368RB_CPU_INSTAG		BIT(15)
+/* Disables inserting custom tag length/type 0x8899 */
+#define RTL8368RB_CPU_NO_TAG		BIT(15)
 
 #define RTL8366RB_SMAR0			0x0070 /* bits 0..15 */
 #define RTL8366RB_SMAR1			0x0071 /* bits 16..31 */
@@ -844,16 +844,14 @@ static int rtl8366rb_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/* Enable CPU port and enable inserting CPU tag
+	/* Enable CPU port with custom DSA tag 8899.
 	 *
-	 * Disabling RTL8368RB_CPU_INSTAG here will change the behaviour
-	 * of the switch totally and it will start talking Realtek RRCP
-	 * internally. It is probably possible to experiment with this,
-	 * but then the kernel needs to understand and handle RRCP first.
+	 * If you set RTL8368RB_CPU_NO_TAG (bit 15) in this registers
+	 * the custom tag is turned off.
 	 */
 	ret = regmap_update_bits(smi->map, RTL8368RB_CPU_CTRL_REG,
 				 0xFFFF,
-				 RTL8368RB_CPU_INSTAG | BIT(smi->cpu_port));
+				 BIT(smi->cpu_port));
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
@@ -967,21 +965,8 @@ static enum dsa_tag_protocol rtl8366_get_tag_protocol(struct dsa_switch *ds,
 						      int port,
 						      enum dsa_tag_protocol mp)
 {
-	/* For now, the RTL switches are handled without any custom tags.
-	 *
-	 * It is possible to turn on "custom tags" by removing the
-	 * RTL8368RB_CPU_INSTAG flag when enabling the port but what it
-	 * does is unfamiliar to DSA: ethernet frames of type 8899, the Realtek
-	 * Remote Control Protocol (RRCP) start to appear on the CPU port of
-	 * the device. So this is not the ordinary few extra bytes in the
-	 * frame. Instead it appears that the switch starts to talk Realtek
-	 * RRCP internally which means a pretty complex RRCP implementation
-	 * decoding and responding the RRCP protocol is needed to exploit this.
-	 *
-	 * The OpenRRCP project (dormant since 2009) have reverse-egineered
-	 * parts of the protocol.
-	 */
-	return DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE;
+	/* This switch uses the 4 byte protocol A Realtek DSA tag */
+	return DSA_TAG_PROTO_RTL4_A;
 }
 
 static void rtl8366rb_adjust_link(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
-- 
2.26.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2 v6] RTL8366RB tagging support
  2020-07-08 12:25 [net-next PATCH 0/2 v6] RTL8366RB tagging support Linus Walleij
  2020-07-08 12:25 ` [net-next PATCH 1/2 v6] net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Implement Realtek 4 byte A tag Linus Walleij
  2020-07-08 12:25 ` [net-next PATCH 2/2 v6] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Support the CPU DSA tag Linus Walleij
@ 2020-07-08 22:36 ` David Miller
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2020-07-08 22:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linus.walleij; +Cc: andrew, vivien.didelot, f.fainelli, netdev

From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date: Wed,  8 Jul 2020 14:25:35 +0200

> This patch set adds DSA tagging support to the RTL8366RB
> DSA driver.
> 
> There is a minor performance improvement in the tag parser
> compared to the previous patch set and the review tags
> have been collected.

Series applied, thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-08 22:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-07-08 12:25 [net-next PATCH 0/2 v6] RTL8366RB tagging support Linus Walleij
2020-07-08 12:25 ` [net-next PATCH 1/2 v6] net: dsa: tag_rtl4_a: Implement Realtek 4 byte A tag Linus Walleij
2020-07-08 12:25 ` [net-next PATCH 2/2 v6] net: dsa: rtl8366rb: Support the CPU DSA tag Linus Walleij
2020-07-08 22:36 ` [net-next PATCH 0/2 v6] RTL8366RB tagging support David Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).