From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D88C433E1 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475E32065F for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:03:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="uSt71JaM" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726687AbgGORC7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:02:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47060 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725798AbgGORC6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 13:02:58 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8704CC061755 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 10:02:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=a2CRZXPeJvwwZak9RXKz3QEP0FS12tt7oHoepp2RUsA=; b=uSt71JaMRHCsBlCVNIdmAGmHk hUsGVzr9rvbgcXCDCcgqdHVSGA+Otf0xf6xzc9+f+1LHvE4cfLrcl1FyGQlodk9UaLv5dWwJIcPE2 C2BvzXKzunbPLp5rdG88xeFtmbnprsKBSld/OcLY+hW0d+FwNpG+VFRnetQXDt27HWwbWOM3BT049 WOjwLu3NBriEitKQI3Oz6JuKQ3m1JZBxGTEsyx1UIpnRk9pOoWQ2MUNXdRfYF2gu3wTOcIr33Z3zF 19L/O382q1kmbgKKeJi/GMJu1dVJQIdIiP0j2cKb338dSd4J4MxTm9cUF/MF/23e7Ro8P+5X0GEjY 0pLWxPnFQ==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:39892) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jvknx-0006wM-Kz; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:02:49 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jvknt-0008Sl-IH; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:02:45 +0100 Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 18:02:45 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Vladimir Oltean Cc: Andrew Lunn , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Ioana Ciornei , Alexandru Marginean , Claudiu Manoil , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , "michael@walle.cc" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Oltean Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 00/13] Phylink PCS updates Message-ID: <20200715170245.GH1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20200630142754.GC1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200714084958.to4n52cnk32prn4v@skbuf> <20200714131832.GC1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200714234652.w2pw3osynbuqw3m4@skbuf> <20200715112100.GG1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200715113441.GR1605@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200715123153.vvvnx6rwgzl5ejuo@skbuf> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200715123153.vvvnx6rwgzl5ejuo@skbuf> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 03:31:53PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:21:01PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 02:46:52AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > > By this I think you are aiming squarely at "[PATCH net-next v3 0/9] net: > > > ethernet backplane support on DPAA1". If I understand you correctly, you > > > are saying that because of the non-phylink models used to represent that > > > system comprised of a clause 49 PCS + clause 72 PMD + clause 73 AN/LT, > > > it is not worth pursuing this phylink-based representation of a clause > > > 37 PCS. > > > > Actually, that is not what I was aiming that comment at - that is not > > something that has been posted recently. I'm not going to explicitly > > point at a patch set. > > > > You are making it unnecessarily difficult to have a meaningful > conversation. Sorry, but no, I really don't have time to spend hours writing endless replies to you explaining in great detail about every minute issue. I spent an hour and a half on that email, and quite frankly, you've used your quota of my time for today. Life is already difficult enough during this time of Covid 19, I really do not need extra pressure from people who need minute detail in every email. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!