netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
	Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
	Tristram Ha <Tristram.Ha@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: microchip: call phy_remove_link_mode during probe
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:18:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200717081852.GA23732@laureti-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200716141044.GA1266257@lunn.ch>

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 04:10:44PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> However, i'm having trouble understanding how PHYs actually work in
> this driver. 
> 
> We have:
> 
> struct ksz_port {
>         u16 member;
>         u16 vid_member;
>         int stp_state;
>         struct phy_device phydev;
> 
> with an instance of this structure per port of the switch.
> 
> And it is this phydev which you are manipulating.
> 
> > +	for (i = 0; i < dev->phy_port_cnt; ++i) {
> > +		/* The MAC actually cannot run in 1000 half-duplex mode. */
> > +		phy_remove_link_mode(&dev->ports[i].phydev,
> > +				     ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Half_BIT);
> > +
> > +		/* PHY does not support gigabit. */
> > +		if (!(dev->features & GBIT_SUPPORT))
> > +			phy_remove_link_mode(&dev->ports[i].phydev,
> > +					     ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_1000baseT_Full_BIT);
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	return 0;
> 
> But how is this phydev associated with the netdev? I don't see how
> phylink_connect_phy() is called using this phydev structure?

The ksz* drivers are implemented using the DSA framework. The relevant
phylink_connect_phy call is issued by the DSA infrastructure. We can see
this (and its ordering relative to phy_remove_link_mode after my patch)
using ftrace by adding the following to the kernel command line:

    trace_options=func_stack_trace ftrace=function ftrace_filter=phylink_connect_phy,phy_remove_link_mode

I've added the trace buffer to the end of this mail to avoid cluttering
it. The key takeaways are:
 * phylink_connect_phy is called by dsa_slave_create. A few inlined
   functions later we arrive at dsa_register_switch, which is called
   during driver probe.
 * All phy_remove_link_mode calls now happen before any
   phylink_connect_phy calls as requested.

Helmut

----8<-----8<------
# tracer: function
#
# entries-in-buffer/entries-written: 10/10   #P:2
#
#                              _-----=> irqs-off
#                             / _----=> need-resched
#                            | / _---=> hardirq/softirq
#                            || / _--=> preempt-depth
#                            ||| /     delay
#           TASK-PID   CPU#  ||||    TIMESTAMP  FUNCTION
#              | |       |   ||||       |         |
       swapper/0-1     [000] ....     7.166645: phy_remove_link_mode <-macb_probe
       swapper/0-1     [000] ....     7.166654: <stack trace>
 => macb_probe
 => platform_drv_probe
 => really_probe
 => driver_probe_device
 => device_driver_attach
 => __driver_attach
 => bus_for_each_dev
 => driver_attach
 => bus_add_driver
 => driver_register
 => __platform_driver_register
 => macb_driver_init
 => do_one_initcall
 => kernel_init_freeable
 => kernel_init
 => ret_from_fork
 => 0
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] ....     7.592479: phy_remove_link_mode <-ksz9477_setup
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] ....     7.592489: <stack trace>
 => ksz9477_setup
 => dsa_register_switch
 => ksz_switch_register
 => ksz9477_switch_register
 => ksz9477_i2c_probe
 => i2c_device_probe
 => really_probe
 => driver_probe_device
 => __device_attach_driver
 => bus_for_each_drv
 => __device_attach
 => device_initial_probe
 => bus_probe_device
 => deferred_probe_work_func
 => process_one_work
 => worker_thread
 => kthread
 => ret_from_fork
 => 0
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] ....     7.592494: phy_remove_link_mode <-ksz9477_setup
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] ....     7.592498: <stack trace>
 => ksz9477_setup
 => dsa_register_switch
 => ksz_switch_register
 => ksz9477_switch_register
 => ksz9477_i2c_probe
 => i2c_device_probe
 => really_probe
 => driver_probe_device
 => __device_attach_driver
 => bus_for_each_drv
 => __device_attach
 => device_initial_probe
 => bus_probe_device
 => deferred_probe_work_func
 => process_one_work
 => worker_thread
 => kthread
 => ret_from_fork
 => 0
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] ....     7.604375: phylink_connect_phy <-dsa_slave_create
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] ....     7.604383: <stack trace>
 => dsa_slave_create
 => dsa_register_switch
 => ksz_switch_register
 => ksz9477_switch_register
 => ksz9477_i2c_probe
 => i2c_device_probe
 => really_probe
 => driver_probe_device
 => __device_attach_driver
 => bus_for_each_drv
 => __device_attach
 => device_initial_probe
 => bus_probe_device
 => deferred_probe_work_func
 => process_one_work
 => worker_thread
 => kthread
 => ret_from_fork
 => 0
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] .n..     7.623675: phylink_connect_phy <-dsa_slave_create
     kworker/1:1-28    [001] .n..     7.623685: <stack trace>
 => dsa_slave_create
 => dsa_register_switch
 => ksz_switch_register
 => ksz9477_switch_register
 => ksz9477_i2c_probe
 => i2c_device_probe
 => really_probe
 => driver_probe_device
 => __device_attach_driver
 => bus_for_each_drv
 => __device_attach
 => device_initial_probe
 => bus_probe_device
 => deferred_probe_work_func
 => process_one_work
 => worker_thread
 => kthread
 => ret_from_fork
 => 0
---->8----->8------

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-17  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-14  8:25 [PATCH] net: phy: phy_remove_link_mode should not advertise new modes Helmut Grohne
2020-07-14 21:07 ` David Miller
2020-07-15  7:03   ` Helmut Grohne
2020-07-15 18:20     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-07-15 19:01       ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-15 18:51     ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-15 19:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-16 12:57   ` [PATCH v2] net: dsa: microchip: call phy_remove_link_mode during probe Helmut Grohne
2020-07-16 14:10     ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-17  8:18       ` Helmut Grohne [this message]
2020-07-17 13:18         ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-20  9:04           ` [PATCH v3] " Helmut Grohne
2020-07-20 20:43             ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21 11:07               ` [PATCH v4] " Helmut Grohne
2020-07-21 15:20                 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21 22:50                 ` David Miller
2020-07-20 21:04             ` [PATCH v3] " Andrew Lunn
2020-07-21  7:38               ` Helmut Grohne

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200717081852.GA23732@laureti-dev \
    --to=helmut.grohne@intenta.de \
    --cc=Tristram.Ha@microchip.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    --cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).