netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	bjorn.topel@intel.com, magnus.karlsson@intel.com,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 2/6] bpf: propagate poke descriptors to subprograms
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 02:03:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200731000324.2253-3-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200731000324.2253-1-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>

Previously, there was no need for poke descriptors being present in
subprogram's bpf_prog_aux struct since tailcalls were simply not allowed
in them. Each subprog is JITed independently so in order to enable
JITing subprograms that use tailcalls, do the following:

- in fixup_bpf_calls() store the index of tailcall insn onto the generated
  poke descriptor,
- then in jit_subprogs() check whether the given poke descriptor belongs
  to the current subprog by checking if that previously stored absolute
  index of tail call insn is in the scope of the insns of given subprog,
- update the insn->imm with new poke descriptor slot so that while JITing
  the proper poke descriptor will be grabbed

This way each of the main program's poke descriptors are distributed
across the subprograms poke descriptor array, so main program's
descriptors can be untracked out of the prog array map.

Add also subprog's aux struct to the BPF map poke_progs list by calling
on it map_poke_track().

In case of any error, call the map_poke_untrack() on subprog's aux
structs that have already been registered to prog array map.

Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h   |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 40c5e206ecf2..8d56b4fba2a6 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -680,6 +680,7 @@ struct bpf_jit_poke_descriptor {
 	bool ip_stable;
 	u8 adj_off;
 	u16 reason;
+	u32 insn_idx;
 };
 
 /* reg_type info for ctx arguments */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index b6ccfce3bf4c..96a339e24e93 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -9982,6 +9982,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 {
 	struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog, **func, *tmp;
 	int i, j, subprog_start, subprog_end = 0, len, subprog;
+	struct bpf_map *map_ptr;
 	struct bpf_insn *insn;
 	void *old_bpf_func;
 	int err, num_exentries;
@@ -10049,6 +10050,31 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		func[i]->aux->btf = prog->aux->btf;
 		func[i]->aux->func_info = prog->aux->func_info;
 
+		for (j = 0; j < prog->aux->size_poke_tab; j++) {
+			u32 insn_idx = prog->aux->poke_tab[j].insn_idx;
+			int ret;
+
+			if (!(insn_idx >= subprog_start &&
+			      insn_idx <= subprog_end))
+				continue;
+
+			ret = bpf_jit_add_poke_descriptor(func[i],
+							  &prog->aux->poke_tab[j]);
+			if (ret < 0) {
+				verbose(env, "adding tail call poke descriptor failed\n");
+				goto out_free;
+			}
+
+			func[i]->insnsi[insn_idx - subprog_start].imm = ret + 1;
+
+			map_ptr = func[i]->aux->poke_tab[ret].tail_call.map;
+			ret = map_ptr->ops->map_poke_track(map_ptr, func[i]->aux);
+			if (ret < 0) {
+				verbose(env, "tracking tail call prog failed\n");
+				goto out_free;
+			}
+		}
+
 		/* Use bpf_prog_F_tag to indicate functions in stack traces.
 		 * Long term would need debug info to populate names
 		 */
@@ -10074,6 +10100,19 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		}
 		cond_resched();
 	}
+
+	/* Untrack main program's aux structs so that during map_poke_run()
+	 * we will not stumble upon the unfilled poke descriptors; each
+	 * of the main program's poke descs got distributed across subprogs
+	 * and got tracked onto map, so we are sure that none of them will
+	 * be missed after the operation below
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < prog->aux->size_poke_tab; i++) {
+		map_ptr = prog->aux->poke_tab[i].tail_call.map;
+
+		map_ptr->ops->map_poke_untrack(map_ptr, prog->aux);
+	}
+
 	/* at this point all bpf functions were successfully JITed
 	 * now populate all bpf_calls with correct addresses and
 	 * run last pass of JIT
@@ -10142,9 +10181,16 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 	bpf_prog_free_unused_jited_linfo(prog);
 	return 0;
 out_free:
-	for (i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++)
-		if (func[i])
-			bpf_jit_free(func[i]);
+	for (i = 0; i < env->subprog_cnt; i++) {
+		if (!func[i])
+			continue;
+
+		for (j = 0; j < func[i]->aux->size_poke_tab; j++) {
+			map_ptr = func[i]->aux->poke_tab[j].tail_call.map;
+			map_ptr->ops->map_poke_untrack(map_ptr, func[i]->aux);
+		}
+		bpf_jit_free(func[i]);
+	}
 	kfree(func);
 out_undo_insn:
 	/* cleanup main prog to be interpreted */
@@ -10362,6 +10408,7 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 					.reason = BPF_POKE_REASON_TAIL_CALL,
 					.tail_call.map = BPF_MAP_PTR(aux->map_ptr_state),
 					.tail_call.key = bpf_map_key_immediate(aux),
+					.insn_idx = i,
 				};
 
 				ret = bpf_jit_add_poke_descriptor(prog, &desc);
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-31  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-31  0:03 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: tailcalls in BPF subprograms Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-31  0:03 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 1/6] bpf, x64: use %rcx instead of %rax for tail call retpolines Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-31  0:03 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2020-07-31  0:03 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 3/6] bpf: rename poke descriptor's 'ip' member to 'tailcall_target' Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-31  0:03 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 4/6] bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-31  0:03 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 5/6] bpf: allow for tailcalls in BPF subprograms for x64 JIT Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-07-31  0:03 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 6/6] selftests: bpf: add dummy prog for bpf2bpf with tailcall Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-08-01  1:03 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: tailcalls in BPF subprograms Daniel Borkmann
2020-08-01  7:13   ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-08-02  3:07     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-08-03 14:00       ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-08-21 17:38         ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-08-26 21:35           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-08-29 23:19             ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2020-09-01 16:24               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-09-02 20:01                 ` Maciej Fijalkowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200731000324.2253-3-maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).