From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E67C433DF for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB6122B3F for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 15:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729269AbgGaPOz (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:14:55 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:37086 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727819AbgGaPOz (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:14:55 -0400 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1k1Wk8-007iKb-Sq; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:14:44 +0200 Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 17:14:44 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Florian Fainelli , Dan Callaghan , Jeremy Linton , Calvin Johnson , Russell King , Jon , Cristi Sovaiala , Ioana Ciornei , Madalin Bucur , netdev , "linux.cj" , linux-acpi Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v7 1/6] Documentation: ACPI: DSD: Document MDIO PHY Message-ID: <20200731151444.GI1712415@lunn.ch> References: <20200715090400.4733-1-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> <20200715090400.4733-2-calvin.johnson@oss.nxp.com> <1a031e62-1e87-fdc1-b672-e3ccf3530fda@arm.com> <20200724133931.GF1472201@lunn.ch> <97973095-5458-8ac2-890c-667f4ea6cd0e@arm.com> <20200724191436.GH1594328@lunn.ch> <1595922651-sup-5323@galangal.danc.bne.opengear.com> <20200728204548.GC1748118@lunn.ch> <7d42152a-2df1-a26c-b619-b804001e0eac@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > > > DT can be used on x86, and i suspect it is a much easier path of least > > > resistance. > > > > And you can easily overlay Device Tree to an existing system by using > > either a full Device Tree overlay (dtbo) or using CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC and > > creating nodes on the fly. > > Why do you need DT on a system that runs without it and Linux has all > means to extend to cover a lot of stuff DT provides for other types of > firmware nodes? As i said, path of least resistance. It is here today, heavily used, well understood by lots of network developers, has a very active maintainer in the form of Rob Herring, and avoids 'showflakes' as Florian likes to call it, so we are all sharing the same code, providing a lot of testing and maintenance. Andrew