From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06F6C433E0 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76D320678 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2020 12:57:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729750AbgHCM5s (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 08:57:48 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:40168 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727083AbgHCM5r (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2020 08:57:47 -0400 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1k2a2A-0082eD-4S; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 14:57:42 +0200 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 14:57:42 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: "Madalin Bucur (OSS)" Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin , Vikas Singh , "f.fainelli@gmail.com" , "hkallweit1@gmail.com" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "Calvin Johnson (OSS)" , kuldip dwivedi , Vikas Singh Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: phy: Associate device node with fixed PHY Message-ID: <20200803125742.GK1862409@lunn.ch> References: <1595938400-13279-3-git-send-email-vikas.singh@puresoftware.com> <20200728130001.GB1712415@lunn.ch> <20200731153119.GJ1712415@lunn.ch> <20200801094132.GH1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200801151107.GK1712415@lunn.ch> <20200803090716.GL1551@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > I see you agree that there were and there will be many changes for a while, > It's not a complaint, I know hot it works, it's just a decision based on > required effort vs features offered vs user requirements. Lately it's been > time consuming to try to fix things in this area. So the conclusion to all this that you are unwilling to use the correct API for this, which would be phylink, and the SFP code. So: NACK Andrew