From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90486C433E6 for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 19:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2862071B for ; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 19:54:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="Qy/69CR4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732776AbgIATyc (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:54:32 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:55216 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731958AbgIATy1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:54:27 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 081JsIOa023999; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:54:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1598990058; bh=Lu82WDTZtjgRfPM+Iobl8OMuRMAy5grVMfYKmRhJHkc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Qy/69CR4Lnh5s2BRaQCJZadpJEDdCF81X+g3R2ZmnXHHjOaSobDTJyzZ/6X5xnABf iPAXTqSbX+RqJbLKlqaB7rizAUdmPZjp7UZyYoksCQb5u9ttaE7jjY9knewy6x8iYN zHSrWAhj+P96bperfKPRA9le0EcaeYrCw0P8TQeA= Received: from DLEE114.ent.ti.com (dlee114.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.25]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 081JsIEg079055 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:54:18 -0500 Received: from DLEE104.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.34) by DLEE114.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:54:18 -0500 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DLEE104.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:54:18 -0500 Received: from uda0868495.fios-router.home (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 081JsFZl093195; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 14:54:17 -0500 From: Murali Karicheri To: , , , , , Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: hsr/prp: add vlan support Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 15:54:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20200901195415.4840-2-m-karicheri2@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200901195415.4840-1-m-karicheri2@ti.com> References: <20200901195415.4840-1-m-karicheri2@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org This patch add support for creating vlan interfaces over hsr/prp interface. Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri --- net/hsr/hsr_device.c | 4 ---- net/hsr/hsr_forward.c | 16 +++++++++++++--- 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_device.c b/net/hsr/hsr_device.c index ab953a1a0d6c..e1951579a3ad 100644 --- a/net/hsr/hsr_device.c +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_device.c @@ -477,10 +477,6 @@ void hsr_dev_setup(struct net_device *dev) /* Prevent recursive tx locking */ dev->features |= NETIF_F_LLTX; - /* VLAN on top of HSR needs testing and probably some work on - * hsr_header_create() etc. - */ - dev->features |= NETIF_F_VLAN_CHALLENGED; /* Not sure about this. Taken from bridge code. netdev_features.h says * it means "Does not change network namespaces". */ diff --git a/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c b/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c index cadfccd7876e..de21df30b0d9 100644 --- a/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c +++ b/net/hsr/hsr_forward.c @@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *hsr_fill_tag(struct sk_buff *skb, struct hsr_port *port, u8 proto_version) { struct hsr_ethhdr *hsr_ethhdr; + unsigned char *pc; int lsdu_size; /* pad to minimum packet size which is 60 + 6 (HSR tag) */ @@ -218,7 +219,18 @@ static struct sk_buff *hsr_fill_tag(struct sk_buff *skb, if (frame->is_vlan) lsdu_size -= 4; - hsr_ethhdr = (struct hsr_ethhdr *)skb_mac_header(skb); + pc = skb_mac_header(skb); + if (frame->is_vlan) + /* This 4-byte shift (size of a vlan tag) does not + * mean that the ethhdr starts there. But rather it + * provides the proper environment for accessing + * the fields, such as hsr_tag etc., just like + * when the vlan tag is not there. This is because + * the hsr tag is after the vlan tag. + */ + hsr_ethhdr = (struct hsr_ethhdr *)(pc + VLAN_HLEN); + else + hsr_ethhdr = (struct hsr_ethhdr *)pc; hsr_set_path_id(hsr_ethhdr, port); set_hsr_tag_LSDU_size(&hsr_ethhdr->hsr_tag, lsdu_size); @@ -511,8 +523,6 @@ static int fill_frame_info(struct hsr_frame_info *frame, if (frame->is_vlan) { vlan_hdr = (struct hsr_vlan_ethhdr *)ethhdr; proto = vlan_hdr->vlanhdr.h_vlan_encapsulated_proto; - /* FIXME: */ - netdev_warn_once(skb->dev, "VLAN not yet supported"); } frame->is_from_san = false; -- 2.17.1