From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Moshe Shemesh <moshe@nvidia.com>,
Moshe Shemesh <moshe@mellanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v3 01/14] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 07:57:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200903055729.GB2997@nanopsycho.orion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200902083025.43407d8f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 05:30:25PM CEST, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
>On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 11:46:27 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >? Do we need such change there too or keep it as is, each action by itself
>> >and return what was performed ?
>>
>> Well, I don't know. User asks for X, X should be performed, not Y or Z.
>> So perhaps the return value is not needed.
>> Just driver advertizes it supports X, Y, Z and the users says:
>> 1) do X, driver does X
>> 2) do Y, driver does Y
>> 3) do Z, driver does Z
>> [
>> I think this kindof circles back to the original proposal...
>
>Why? User does not care if you activate new devlink params when
>activating new firmware. Trust me. So why make the user figure out
>which of all possible reset option they should select? If there is
>a legitimate use case to limit what is reset - it should be handled
>by a separate negative attribute, like --live which says don't reset
>anything.
I see. Okay. Could you please sum-up the interface as you propose it?
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-03 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-30 15:27 [PATCH net-next RFC v3 00/14] Add devlink reload action option Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 01/14] devlink: Add reload action option to devlink reload command Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-31 12:15 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-01 19:43 ` Moshe Shemesh
2020-09-02 9:46 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-02 15:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-03 5:57 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2020-09-03 19:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-04 9:04 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-04 19:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-07 13:46 ` Moshe Shemesh
2020-09-07 17:58 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-09 13:27 ` Moshe Shemesh
2020-09-09 19:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-10 5:16 ` Vasundhara Volam
2020-09-10 6:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 02/14] devlink: Add reload actions counters Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-31 10:48 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-01 19:05 ` Moshe Shemesh
2020-09-02 0:01 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-09-04 5:03 ` Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 03/14] devlink: Add reload actions counters to dev get Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-31 10:44 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-09-01 19:00 ` Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 04/14] net/mlx5: Add functions to set/query MFRL register Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 05/14] net/mlx5: Set cap for pci sync for fw update event Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 06/14] net/mlx5: Handle sync reset request event Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 07/14] net/mlx5: Handle sync reset now event Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 08/14] net/mlx5: Handle sync reset abort event Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 09/14] net/mlx5: Add support for devlink reload action fw activate Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 10/14] devlink: Add enable_remote_dev_reset generic parameter Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 11/14] net/mlx5: Add devlink param enable_remote_dev_reset support Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 12/14] net/mlx5: Add support for fw live patch event Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 13/14] net/mlx5: Add support for devlink reload action fw activate no reset Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-30 15:27 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 14/14] devlink: Add Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-reload.rst Moshe Shemesh
2020-08-31 10:49 ` [PATCH net-next RFC v3 00/14] Add devlink reload action option Jiri Pirko
2020-09-01 20:05 ` Moshe Shemesh
[not found] ` <36e30108-26e3-44ae-e133-48d412f7efe6@nvidia.com>
2020-09-02 7:55 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200903055729.GB2997@nanopsycho.orion \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@mellanox.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moshe@mellanox.com \
--cc=moshe@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).