From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: kliteyn@nvidia.com
Cc: saeed@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
erezsh@nvidia.com, mbloch@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 01/15] net/mlx5: DR, Add buddy allocator utilities
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:41:49 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200928.144149.790487567012040407.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR12MB423444C484839CF7FB7AA6B3C0350@DM6PR12MB4234.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
From: Yevgeny Kliteynik <kliteyn@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:58:59 +0000
> By replacing the bits-per-long array with a single counter we loose
> this ability to jump faster to the free spot.
I don't understand why this is true, because upon the free we will
update the hint and that's where the next bit search will start.
Have you even tried my suggestion?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-28 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-25 19:37 [pull request][net-next 00/15] mlx5 SW steering updates 2020-09-25 saeed
2020-09-25 19:37 ` [net-next 01/15] net/mlx5: DR, Add buddy allocator utilities saeed
2020-09-26 22:15 ` David Miller
2020-09-28 19:58 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
2020-09-28 21:41 ` David Miller [this message]
2020-09-29 20:44 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
2020-10-06 13:02 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
2020-10-06 14:47 ` David Miller
2020-10-07 21:25 ` Yevgeny Kliteynik
2020-09-25 19:37 ` [net-next 02/15] net/mlx5: DR, Handle ICM memory via buddy allocation instead of bucket management saeed
2020-09-25 19:37 ` [net-next 03/15] net/mlx5: DR, Sync chunks only during free saeed
2020-09-25 19:37 ` [net-next 04/15] net/mlx5: DR, ICM memory pools sync optimization saeed
2020-09-25 19:37 ` [net-next 05/15] net/mlx5: DR, Free buddy ICM memory if it is unused saeed
2020-09-25 19:38 ` [net-next 06/15] net/mlx5: E-switch, Use PF num in metadata reg c0 saeed
2020-09-25 19:38 ` [net-next 07/15] net/mlx5: DR, Replace the check for valid STE entry saeed
2020-09-25 19:38 ` [net-next 08/15] net/mlx5: DR, Remove unneeded check from source port builder saeed
2020-09-25 19:38 ` [net-next 09/15] net/mlx5: DR, Remove unneeded vlan check from L2 builder saeed
2020-09-25 19:38 ` [net-next 10/15] net/mlx5: DR, Remove unneeded local variable saeed
2020-09-25 19:38 ` [net-next 11/15] net/mlx5: DR, Call ste_builder directly with tag pointer saeed
2020-09-25 19:38 ` [net-next 12/15] net/mlx5: DR, Remove unused member of action struct saeed
2020-09-25 19:38 ` [net-next 13/15] net/mlx5: DR, Rename builders HW specific names saeed
2020-09-25 19:38 ` [net-next 14/15] net/mlx5: DR, Rename matcher functions to be more HW agnostic saeed
2020-09-25 19:38 ` [net-next 15/15] net/mlx5: DR, Add support for rule creation with flow source hint saeed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200928.144149.790487567012040407.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=erezsh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kliteyn@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mbloch@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).