From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C36C433DF for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 23:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C95020760 for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 23:15:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1602371701; bh=JNOsIeD12F+9MNDjjZnrguy+mJxJuiZof73TVNTcE20=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=vNvb8yH67Gmf/DMfgfFuLl/lehhcdPFMxgfXmNTZ5Ihtjume0obRNjWez0fIQGmCZ uEUWk5NvcsQnO0TW93lAuRyHtMf56pCYbu77013YL+AVgtarhJBUgt8Wt+pKGIXlJK 2Ql7hyOudfMBtSPIQUmedWNjlD+0mamcD1Mf0R/A= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388342AbgJJWxs (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Oct 2020 18:53:48 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48068 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730332AbgJJSve (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Oct 2020 14:51:34 -0400 Received: from kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com (unknown [163.114.132.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85F37223BD; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 18:51:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1602355893; bh=JNOsIeD12F+9MNDjjZnrguy+mJxJuiZof73TVNTcE20=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rEXl9wcPr0Fk2GdrRdnUdN5oEt+tn3s0k2niNZMlB9NSsp82pnNmtZ1vMNgWQ9Li3 HEijIFb3iN3qpL7PnwSW09MEM5H0HRcsKQdnBa5pCiAeXElLOx4Ln0192b51SapwzH UWg8ajlyeldlTFEFg9q+5kcZP9RO8zUA6riKcMOA= Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2020 11:51:31 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] virtio_net: handle non-napi callers to virtnet_poll_tx Message-ID: <20201010115131.559376e1@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <20201008183436.3093286-1-jonathan.lemon@gmail.com> References: <20201008183436.3093286-1-jonathan.lemon@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 8 Oct 2020 11:34:36 -0700 Jonathan Lemon wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > index 21b71148c532..59f65ac9e4c7 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > @@ -1518,7 +1518,7 @@ static int virtnet_poll_tx(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) > > txq = netdev_get_tx_queue(vi->dev, index); > __netif_tx_lock(txq, raw_smp_processor_id()); > - free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, true); > + free_old_xmit_skbs(sq, budget != 0); > __netif_tx_unlock(txq); > > virtqueue_napi_complete(napi, sq->vq, 0); Looks like virtnet_poll_cleantx() needs the same treatment.