From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2 1/3] bpf_redirect_neigh: Support supplying the nexthop as a helper parameter
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 12:01:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201020120128.338595e9@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v9f422jx.fsf@toke.dk>
On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 20:08:18 +0200 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > Isn't this backward? The hole could be named in the internal structure.
> > This is a bit of a gray area, but if you name this hole in uAPI and
> > programs start referring to it you will never be able to reuse it.
> > So you may as well not require it to be zeroed..
>
> Hmm, yeah, suppose you're right. Doesn't the verifier prevent any part
> of the memory from being unitialised anyway? I seem to recall having run
> into verifier complaints when I didn't initialise struct on the stack...
Good point, in which case we have a convenient way to zero the hole
after nh_family but no convenient way to zero the empty address space
for IPv4 :) (even though that one only needs to be zeroed for the
verifier)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-20 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-20 10:51 [PATCH bpf v2 0/3] bpf: Rework bpf_redirect_neigh() to allow supplying nexthop from caller Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-20 10:51 ` [PATCH bpf v2 1/3] bpf_redirect_neigh: Support supplying the nexthop as a helper parameter Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-20 15:08 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-10-20 18:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-20 16:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-20 18:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-20 19:01 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2020-10-20 19:47 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-10-20 18:12 ` David Ahern
2020-10-20 18:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-20 16:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-20 18:03 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-20 18:14 ` David Ahern
2020-10-20 18:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-10-20 10:51 ` [PATCH bpf v2 2/3] bpf_fib_lookup: optionally skip neighbour lookup Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-20 13:49 ` David Ahern
2020-10-20 15:04 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-10-20 18:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-10-20 10:51 ` [PATCH bpf v2 3/3] selftests: Update test_tc_redirect.sh to use the modified bpf_redirect_neigh() Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201020120128.338595e9@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).