From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E008AC388F9 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1FB207BB for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 18:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1794616AbgJ0Sdq (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:33:46 -0400 Received: from mail.nic.cz ([217.31.204.67]:43650 "EHLO mail.nic.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2506351AbgJ0Sdp (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Oct 2020 14:33:45 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a0e:b107:ae1:0:3e97:eff:fe61:c680]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66103140757; Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:33:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:33:37 +0100 From: Marek Behun To: Tobias Waldekranz Cc: Andrew Lunn , vivien.didelot@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, olteanv@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] net: dsa: link aggregation support Message-ID: <20201027193337.50f22df0@nic.cz> In-Reply-To: <87k0vbv84z.fsf@waldekranz.com> References: <20201027105117.23052-1-tobias@waldekranz.com> <20201027160530.11fc42db@nic.cz> <20201027152330.GF878328@lunn.ch> <87k0vbv84z.fsf@waldekranz.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.6 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.2 at mail X-Virus-Status: Clean Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > In order for this to work on transmit, we need to add forward offloading > to the bridge so that we can, for example, send one FORWARD from the CPU > to send an ARP broadcast to swp1..4 instead of four FROM_CPUs. Wouldn't this be solved if the CPU master interface was a bonding interface?