Re: [PATCH net-next v2 06/11] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: basic interrupt support

[Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:35:32PM +0100, Christian Eggers wrote:
> Interrupts are required for TX time stamping. Probably they could also
> be used for PHY connection status.

Do the KSZ switches have an internal PHY? And there's a single interrupt
line, shared between the PTP timestamping engine, and the internal PHY
that is driver by phylib?

> This patch only adds the basic infrastructure for interrupts, no
> interrupts are actually enabled nor handled.
>
> ksz9477_reset_switch() must be called before requesting the IRQ (in
> ksz9477_init() instead of ksz9477_setup()).

A patch can never be "too simple". Maybe you could factor out that code
movement into a separate patch.

> Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477_i2c.c  |   2 +
>  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477_main.c | 103 +++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477_spi.c  |   2 +
>  include/linux/dsa/ksz_common.h           |   1 +
>  4 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477_i2c.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477_i2c.c
> index 4e053a25d077..4ed1f503044a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477_i2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477_i2c.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ static int ksz9477_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
>  	if (i2c->dev.platform_data)
>  		dev->pdata = i2c->dev.platform_data;
>
> +	dev->irq = i2c->irq;
> +
>  	ret = ksz9477_switch_register(dev);
>
>  	/* Main DSA driver may not be started yet. */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477_main.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477_main.c
> index abfd3802bb51..6b5a981fb21f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz9477_main.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,9 @@
>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +#include <linux/irq.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_data/microchip-ksz.h>
>  #include <linux/phy.h>
>  #include <linux/if_bridge.h>
> @@ -1345,19 +1347,12 @@ static void ksz9477_config_cpu_port(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>  static int ksz9477_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>  {
>  	struct ksz_device *dev = ds->priv;
> -	int ret = 0;
>
>  	dev->vlan_cache = devm_kcalloc(dev->dev, sizeof(struct vlan_table),
>  				       dev->num_vlans, GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!dev->vlan_cache)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>
> -	ret = ksz9477_reset_switch(dev);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(ds->dev, "failed to reset switch\n");
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> -
>  	/* Required for port partitioning. */
>  	ksz9477_cfg32(dev, REG_SW_QM_CTRL__4, UNICAST_VLAN_BOUNDARY,
>  		      true);
> @@ -1535,12 +1530,84 @@ static const struct ksz_chip_data ksz9477_switch_chips[] = {
>  	},
>  };
>
> +static irqreturn_t ksz9477_switch_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct ksz_device *dev = dev_id;
> +	u32 data;
> +	int port;
> +	int ret;
> +	irqreturn_t result = IRQ_NONE;

Please keep local variable declaration sorted in the reverse order of
line length. But....

> +
> +	/* Read global port interrupt status register */
> +	ret = ksz_read32(dev, REG_SW_PORT_INT_STATUS__4, &data);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return result;

...Is there any point at all in keeping the "result" variable?

> +
> +	for (port = 0; port < dev->port_cnt; port++) {
> +		if (data & BIT(port)) {

You can reduce the indentation level by 1 here using:

		if (!(data & BIT(port)))
			continue;

> +			u8 data8;
> +
> +			/* Read port interrupt status register */
> +			ret = ksz_read8(dev, PORT_CTRL_ADDR(port, REG_PORT_INT_STATUS),
> +					&data8);
> +			if (ret)
> +				return result;
> +
> +			/* ToDo: Add specific handling of port interrupts */

Buggy? Please return IRQ_HANDLED, otherwise the system, when bisected to
this commit exactly, will emit interrupts and complain that nobody cared.

> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return result;
> +}
> +
> +static int ksz9477_enable_port_interrupts(struct ksz_device *dev)
> +{
> +	u32 data;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = ksz_read32(dev, REG_SW_PORT_INT_MASK__4, &data);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Enable port interrupts (0 means enabled) */
> +	data &= ~((1 << dev->port_cnt) - 1);

And what's the " - 1" for?

> +	ret = ksz_write32(dev, REG_SW_PORT_INT_MASK__4, data);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;

	return ksz_write32(dev, REG_SW_PORT_INT_MASK__4, data);

> +}
> +
> +static int ksz9477_disable_port_interrupts(struct ksz_device *dev)
> +{
> +	u32 data;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = ksz_read32(dev, REG_SW_PORT_INT_MASK__4, &data);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	/* Disable port interrupts (1 means disabled) */
> +	data |= ((1 << dev->port_cnt) - 1);
> +	ret = ksz_write32(dev, REG_SW_PORT_INT_MASK__4, data);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return 0;

same comments as above.

Also, it's almost as if you want to implement these in the same
function, with a "bool enable"?

> +}
> +
>  static int ksz9477_switch_init(struct ksz_device *dev)
>  {
> -	int i;
> +	int i, ret;
>
>  	dev->ds->ops = &ksz9477_switch_ops;
>
> +	ret = ksz9477_reset_switch(dev);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(dev->dev, "failed to reset switch\n");
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ksz9477_switch_chips); i++) {
>  		const struct ksz_chip_data *chip = &ksz9477_switch_chips[i];
>
> @@ -1584,12 +1651,32 @@ static int ksz9477_switch_init(struct ksz_device *dev)
>
>  	/* set the real number of ports */
>  	dev->ds->num_ports = dev->port_cnt;
> +	if (dev->irq > 0) {
> +		unsigned long irqflags = irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_get_irq_data(dev->irq));

What is irqd_get_trigger_type and what does it have to do with the
"irqflags" argument of request_threaded_irq? Where else have you even
seen this?

> +
> +		irqflags |= IRQF_ONESHOT;

And shared maybe?

> +		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev->dev, dev->irq, NULL,
> +						ksz9477_switch_irq_thread,
> +						irqflags,
> +						dev_name(dev->dev),
> +						dev);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(dev->dev, "failed to request IRQ.\n");
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = ksz9477_enable_port_interrupts(dev);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;

Could you also clear pending interrupts before enabling the line?

> +	}
>
>  	return 0;
>  }
>
>  static void ksz9477_switch_exit(struct ksz_device *dev)
>  {
> +	if (dev->irq > 0)
> +		ksz9477_disable_port_interrupts(dev);

I think it'd look a bit nicer if you moved this condition into
ksz9477_disable_port_interrupts:

	if (!dev->irq)
		return;

>  	ksz9477_reset_switch(dev);
>  }
>