From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36717C63699 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 00:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0667B22275 for ; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 00:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726230AbgKNAkH (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:40:07 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:54690 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726156AbgKNAkH (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2020 19:40:07 -0500 Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kdjbm-006x9O-72; Sat, 14 Nov 2020 01:40:02 +0100 Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2020 01:40:02 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Jernej =?utf-8?Q?=C5=A0krabec?= , Daniel Thompson , Sumit Garg , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Masami Hiramatsu , Steve McIntyre , "open list:BPF JIT for MIPS (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , Willy Liu , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Sasha Levin , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Masahisa Kojima , Ilias Apalodimas Subject: Re: Re: realtek PHY commit bbc4d71d63549 causes regression Message-ID: <20201114004002.GV1480543@lunn.ch> References: <20201029143934.GO878328@lunn.ch> <20201029144644.GA70799@apalos.home> <2697795.ZkNf1YqPoC@kista> <20201113144401.GM1456319@lunn.ch> <20201113165625.GN1456319@lunn.ch> <20201113224301.GU1480543@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > One question that still has not been answered is how many actual > platforms were fixed by backporting Realtek's follow up fix to > -stable. My suspicion is none. That by itself should be enough > justification to revert the backport of that change. I think i've already said that would be a good idea. It makes the problem less critical. But the problem is still there, we are just kicking the can down the road. I've not seen much activity actually fixing the broken DT. So i suspect when we catch up with the can, we will mostly still be in the same place. Actually, maybe worse, because broken DTs have been copy/pasted for new boards? Andrew