From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D74C388F9 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E38246E1 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:22:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="SykaFT23" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726321AbgKSHWg (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 02:22:36 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54402 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726107AbgKSHWf (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Nov 2020 02:22:35 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x444.google.com (mail-pf1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::444]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511D5C0613CF; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:22:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x444.google.com with SMTP id t8so3591602pfg.8; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:22:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=1RR09oXTHNj5D+VKWnXusC3Un6VRBPlQtmYv6ZSUsVI=; b=SykaFT23R/hVbaREPLzvW2AP15wUqLT+sWT6x4PeBzYCErRpZXTA1blPK8ZCNOSxv9 z/GwsF9uEXlQR2OLiRYvAzouSE8DSpnE24YnQkxJFQONJa7luOgYcXwZfdJkrPRxT0Gu kAX5lmyGFh/3df3LBvVhI0+6/LIPvbIGmYYzvt4o3biOa5rKpVjRcdwg7aaiduza9Zn3 MWwUrm3AVbMFTJQ+S/Gqgn/bvoan5rIB3N8hHg5cEdFqJck0lIQdUHrcn9fM33vEMfKj oyTr57Bz8FN2o1sYa+eyj3Rv2XZ7eh5TCuPjJRLUHeX+M+SCVAu8CDYTYdIZOvwfUr0P UfFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=1RR09oXTHNj5D+VKWnXusC3Un6VRBPlQtmYv6ZSUsVI=; b=Z6+1QJDmvtgTvkwfz3hdv7wIIKH9ec2a+LAFH4/zMADv8giAnJ6KGHvzcMmz2x8tAU wTiQSZqcs9CTft6po5WIiwOPv/US8nHl4wa97c1W7YqUf/39rh8EwCQzkZ2Tii4lLtAt iAIqnF6kvepN/TcueR9RQl8kg9eLETOUGNHNDD9Yg+/e8tSyvTu6QkizzX2+RDEjFcGX /D/6Gcaslz1go0gL49MnWViUzUh+blWmv5a8MjH20oAp3rKuXsj6RG9wZon8sqGmhzRc 1ZvfDAXKmFaEcJpJL+AgJodCF6I/RAFnAXnUsDEqb3E/Tdo7RB0INcOcI0YjPRJGOZk3 O67Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5308NFDH5ua9OWuRC5WCJZJNFKArwV5ltmyusUOWNZI/i1K6bnwp C1Cby87MbBMPCPpWn7NtJaw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSM7bcPvfkrjRN4rBPjOShGGjdnAqFCLalTUBjlOLyt6Pi2bllffDYwvcM9ExJ8zAEz39WSQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:8d03:: with SMTP id c3mr3172717pjo.100.1605770554821; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:22:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from taoren-ubuntu-R90MNF91 (c-73-252-146-110.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.252.146.110]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v191sm27585931pfc.19.2020.11.18.23.22.32 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:22:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 23:22:26 -0800 From: Tao Ren To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Andrew Lunn , Jean Delvare , Jonathan Corbet , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org, taoren@fb.com, mikechoi@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] hwmon: (max127) Add Maxim MAX127 hardware monitoring Message-ID: <20201119072225.GA19877@taoren-ubuntu-R90MNF91> References: <20201118230929.18147-1-rentao.bupt@gmail.com> <20201118232719.GI1853236@lunn.ch> <20201118234252.GA18681@taoren-ubuntu-R90MNF91> <20201119010119.GA248686@roeck-us.net> <20201119012653.GA249502@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201119012653.GA249502@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 05:26:53PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 05:01:19PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:42:53PM -0800, Tao Ren wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:27:19AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:09:27PM -0800, rentao.bupt@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > From: Tao Ren > > > > > > > > > > The patch series adds hardware monitoring driver for the Maxim MAX127 > > > > > chip. > > > > > > > > Hi Tao > > > > > > > > Why are using sending a hwmon driver to the networking mailing list? > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > > I added netdev because the mailing list is included in "get_maintainer.pl > > > Documentation/hwmon/index.rst" output. Is it the right command to find > > > reviewers? Could you please suggest? Thank you. > > > > I have no idea why running get_maintainer.pl on > > Documentation/hwmon/index.rst returns such a large list of mailing > > lists and people. For some reason it includes everyone in the XDP > > maintainer list. If anyone has an idea how that happens, please > > let me know - we'll want to get this fixed to avoid the same problem > > in the future. > > > > I found it. The XDP maintainer entry has: > > K: xdp > > This matches Documentation/hwmon/index.rst. > > $ grep xdp Documentation/hwmon/index.rst > xdpe12284 > > It seems to me that a context match such as "xdp" in MAINTAINERS isn't > really appropriate. "xdp" matches a total of 348 files in the kernel. > The large majority of those is not XDP related. The maintainers > of XDP (and all the listed mailing lists) should not be surprised > to get a large number of odd review requests if they want to review > every single patch on files which include the term "xdp". > > Guenter Thanks Guenter and Andrew. Given xdp maintainers were included by mistake, I will remove them from the future discussions of this hwmon patch series. Cheers, Tao