netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, jchapman@katalix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] ppp: add PPPIOCBRIDGECHAN and PPPIOCUNBRIDGECHAN ioctls
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 16:05:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201210150551.GB15778@linux.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210144623.GA4413@katalix.com>

On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 02:46:23PM +0000, Tom Parkin wrote:
> On  Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 17:22:28 +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 04:36:55PM +0000, Tom Parkin wrote:
> > > +		case PPPIOCBRIDGECHAN:
> > > +			if (get_user(unit, p))
> > > +				break;
> > > +			err = -ENXIO;
> > > +			pn = ppp_pernet(current->nsproxy->net_ns);
> > > +			spin_lock_bh(&pn->all_channels_lock);
> > > +			pchb = ppp_find_channel(pn, unit);
> > > +			/* Hold a reference to prevent pchb being freed while
> > > +			 * we establish the bridge.
> > > +			 */
> > > +			if (pchb)
> > > +				refcount_inc(&pchb->file.refcnt);
> > 
> > The !pchb case isn't handled. With this code, if ppp_find_channel()
> > returns NULL, ppp_bridge_channels() will crash when trying to lock
> > pchb->upl.
> 
> Bleh :-(
> 
> Apologies for this.  I have stepped up my tests for "unhappy" code
> paths, and I'll try to run syzkaller at a v4 prior to re-submitting.

No problem, sorry for not having spotted the problem in your previous
version. BTW, note that net-next is probably about to close.

> > > +			spin_unlock_bh(&pn->all_channels_lock);
> > > +			err = ppp_bridge_channels(pch, pchb);
> > > +			/* Drop earlier refcount now bridge establishment is complete */
> > > +			if (refcount_dec_and_test(&pchb->file.refcnt))
> > > +				ppp_destroy_channel(pchb);
> > > +			break;
> > > +
> > 
> > The rest looks good to me.
> 
> Thanks!



  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-10 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-04 16:36 [PATCH v3 net-next 0/2] add ppp_generic ioctl(s) to bridge channels Tom Parkin
2020-12-04 16:36 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/2] ppp: add PPPIOCBRIDGECHAN and PPPIOCUNBRIDGECHAN ioctls Tom Parkin
2020-12-07 16:22   ` Guillaume Nault
2020-12-10 14:46     ` Tom Parkin
2020-12-10 15:05       ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2020-12-04 16:36 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/2] docs: update ppp_generic.rst to document new ioctls Tom Parkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201210150551.GB15778@linux.home \
    --to=gnault@redhat.com \
    --cc=jchapman@katalix.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tparkin@katalix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).