netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
To: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net: mrp: fix definitions of MRP test packets
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 18:59:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201223175910.2ipmowhcn63mqtqt@soft-dev3.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201223144533.4145-2-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>

The 12/23/2020 15:45, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:

Hi Rasmus,
> 
> Wireshark says that the MRP test packets cannot be decoded - and the
> reason for that is that there's a two-byte hole filled with garbage
> between the "transitions" and "timestamp" members.
> 
> So Wireshark decodes the two garbage bytes and the top two bytes of
> the timestamp written by the kernel as the timestamp value (which thus
> fluctuates wildly), and interprets the lower two bytes of the
> timestamp as a new (type, length) pair, which is of course broken.
> 
> While my copy of the MRP standard is still under way [*], I cannot
> imagine the standard specifying a two-byte hole here, and whoever
> wrote the Wireshark decoding code seems to agree with that.
> 
> The struct definitions live under include/uapi/, but they are not
> really part of any kernel<->userspace API/ABI, so fixing the
> definitions by adding the packed attribute should not cause any
> compatibility issues.
> 
> The remaining on-the-wire packet formats likely also don't contain
> holes, but pahole and manual inspection says the current definitions
> suffice. So adding the packed attribute to those is not strictly
> needed, but might be done for good measure.
> 
> [*] I will never understand how something hidden behind a +1000$
> paywall can be called a standard.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
> ---
>  include/uapi/linux/mrp_bridge.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mrp_bridge.h b/include/uapi/linux/mrp_bridge.h
> index 6aeb13ef0b1e..d1d0cf65916d 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/mrp_bridge.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/mrp_bridge.h
> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ struct br_mrp_ring_test_hdr {
>         __be16 state;
>         __be16 transitions;
>         __be32 timestamp;
> -};
> +} __attribute__((__packed__));

Yes, I agree that this should be packed but it also needs to be 32 bit
alligned, so extra 2 bytes are needed.
The same will apply also for 'br_mrp_ring_topo_hdr'

> 
>  struct br_mrp_ring_topo_hdr {
>         __be16 prio;
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ struct br_mrp_in_test_hdr {
>         __be16 state;
>         __be16 transitions;
>         __be32 timestamp;
> -};
> +} __attribute__((__packed__));
> 
>  struct br_mrp_in_topo_hdr {
>         __u8 sa[ETH_ALEN];
> --
> 2.23.0
> 

-- 
/Horatiu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-23 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-23 14:45 [PATCH net 0/2] MRP without hardware offload? Rasmus Villemoes
2020-12-23 14:45 ` [PATCH net 1/2] net: mrp: fix definitions of MRP test packets Rasmus Villemoes
2020-12-23 17:59   ` Horatiu Vultur [this message]
2020-12-23 18:41     ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-23 19:22       ` Horatiu Vultur
2020-12-28 22:24   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-03 13:29     ` Horatiu Vultur
2021-01-19 15:42     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-01-19 17:45       ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-12-23 14:45 ` [PATCH net 2/2] net: switchdev: don't set port_obj_info->handled true when -EOPNOTSUPP Rasmus Villemoes
2020-12-28 22:26   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-12-23 18:14 ` [PATCH net 0/2] MRP without hardware offload? Horatiu Vultur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201223175910.2ipmowhcn63mqtqt@soft-dev3.localdomain \
    --to=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).