From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FE2C43219 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 23:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90B5222F9 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 23:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729799AbgL1Wzh (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Dec 2020 17:55:37 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60886 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729410AbgL1UXq (ORCPT ); Mon, 28 Dec 2020 15:23:46 -0500 Received: from mail-qk1-x733.google.com (mail-qk1-x733.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::733]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40436C061798 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:23:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qk1-x733.google.com with SMTP id p14so9814572qke.6 for ; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:23:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9EpTdIYOFXIEGqAx9s+sFGrEVZtrYKtNXXy9SEY9qRE=; b=XzEoX7se7gdT+PPesqt7TRoQ5DJYbGHBQPFSEnWBTeaycsn8zErxFaVUwZ6O0/eBQX JvXxcj07SrGRt8NC+oCDbEX8H9ZEy8wQwyzMPGTYjfgh5PwbOjZCH4sux40D36rzbCl8 a5zKHuOxyxEYgEc6rSpQIj9wvML1U7hH2O23Y= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=9EpTdIYOFXIEGqAx9s+sFGrEVZtrYKtNXXy9SEY9qRE=; b=K2OZe9B0PlWVcCu6yPYeD6cj8sDBr0r/gfynol4A6dgB6FuW9zKdpycUxijdzyJeZs yvc88r5kNwkTiCca8zWZtKI8zNW3yt/V1cbexlLujq8tj5CFClzYoKoK2JokRUjBhnUX 3IEAtI8IFL7lbfSsaa4WuOxxZ9sYtn1H9ouDhuFbZ0T7FJwOGBYCfP6wi62a8JOXGV8x MkwmkX5jSpG8XRPhGnjnoO8ss5+cDcZMRBmrKZmsSkR7fTEfWaceQ6nvB9Q8w4bE7/tZ LelmneNYiKbARfcSKQu0H/HKKUphGIk0dNQ9G5y0voVo8tabqYdq+z6nGrhgckeVV+4O pkAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532CbvQ5+TJRWASVqqb8Y8lE2memfKz3+I+hgoEPrJkHolkYA08C lRsnxffKQYu4a6QZ33jqhIuGpgtEZZmiMlp7 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxq/0XcSIyWLCuk2o5XNjIVM6Bureox3/RV7HCZzpMA0Y+pdx2v3wSOCsNVXetAzx3iObNPoQ== X-Received: by 2002:a37:b543:: with SMTP id e64mr37520059qkf.10.1609186985195; Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:23:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from chatter.i7.local ([89.36.78.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g26sm24036747qkl.60.2020.12.28.12.23.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 28 Dec 2020 12:23:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2020 15:23:02 -0500 From: Konstantin Ryabitsev To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Andrew Lunn , Dinghao Liu , kjlu@umn.edu, "David S. Miller" , Jesse Brandeburg , Arnd Bergmann , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: Fix memleak in ethoc_probe Message-ID: <20201228202302.afkxtco27j4ahh6d@chatter.i7.local> References: <20201223110615.31389-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> <20201223153304.GD3198262@lunn.ch> <20201223123218.1cf7d9cb@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20201223210044.GA3253993@lunn.ch> <20201223131149.15fff8d2@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <680850a9-8ab0-4672-498e-6dc740720da3@gmail.com> <20201223174146.37e62326@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20201224180631.l4zieher54ncqvwl@chatter.i7.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 01:57:40PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> Konstantin, would you be willing to mod the kernel.org instance of > >> patchwork to populate Fixes tags in the generated mboxes? > > > > I'd really rather not -- we try not to diverge from project upstream if at all > > possible, as this dramatically complicates upgrades. > > Well that is really unfortunate then because the Linux developer > community settled on using the Fixes: tag for years now and having > patchwork automatically append those tags would greatly help maintainers. I agree -- but this is something that needs to be implemented upstream. Picking up a one-off patch just for patchwork.kernel.org is not the right way to go about this. -K