netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2] net: ks8851: Fix mixed module/builtin build
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 21:39:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210116203945.GA32445@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3qtrmxMg+uva-s18f_zj7aNXJXcJCzorr2d-XxnqV1Hw@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 08:26:22PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 6:56 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> > On 1/16/21 6:04 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 5:48 PM Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't really like this version, as it does not actually solve the problem of
> > > linking the same object file into both vmlinux and a loadable module, which
> > > can have all kinds of side-effects besides that link failure you saw.
> > >
> > > If you want to avoid exporting all those symbols, a simpler hack would
> > > be to '#include "ks8851_common.c" from each of the two files, which
> > > then always duplicates the contents (even when both are built-in), but
> > > at least builds the file the correct way.
> >
> > That's the same as V1, isn't it ?
> 
> Ah, I had not actually looked at the original submission, but yes, that
> was slightly better than v2, provided you make all symbols static to
> avoid the new link error.
> 
> I still think that having three modules and exporting the symbols from
> the common part as Heiner Kallweit suggested would be the best
> way to do it.

FWIW I'd prefer V1 (the #include approach) as it allows going back to
using static inlines for register access.  That's what we had before
7a552c850c45.

It seems unlikely that a system uses both, the parallel *and* the SPI
variant of the ks8851.  So the additional memory necessary because of
code duplication wouldn't matter in practice.

Thanks,

Lukas

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-16 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-16 16:48 [PATCH net-next V2] net: ks8851: Fix mixed module/builtin build Marek Vasut
2021-01-16 17:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-16 17:54   ` Marek Vasut
2021-01-16 19:26     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-01-16 20:39       ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2021-01-16 21:25         ` Marek Vasut
2021-01-16 21:41           ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-01-17 10:21             ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210116203945.GA32445@wunner.de \
    --to=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).