From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6967C433E0 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB6464F5E for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 10:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235386AbhBDKtv (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 05:49:51 -0500 Received: from stargate.chelsio.com ([12.32.117.8]:4252 "EHLO stargate.chelsio.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234873AbhBDKtu (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2021 05:49:50 -0500 Received: from localhost ([10.193.185.238]) by stargate.chelsio.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 114AmrTd021689; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 02:48:54 -0800 Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:18:54 +0530 From: Raju Rangoju To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] cxgb4: Add new T6 PCI device id 0x6092 Message-ID: <20210204104852.GA10526@chelsio.com> References: <20210202182511.8109-1-rajur@chelsio.com> <20210203182337.3a77480a@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210203182337.3a77480a@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, February 02/03/21, 2021 at 18:23:37 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 23:55:11 +0530 Raju Rangoju wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Raju Rangoju > > Does this device require any code which only exists in net-next? > No code dependency exists in net-next > Pure device id patches are okay for net. Sure, it can go net tree.