From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com, jiang.wang@bytedance.com,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: [Patch bpf-next v6 8/8] skmsg: get rid of sk_psock_bpf_run()
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 21:29:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210220052924.106599-9-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210220052924.106599-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
It is now nearly identical to bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() and
it has an unused parameter 'psock', so we can just get rid
of it and call bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() directly.
Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
---
net/core/skmsg.c | 14 ++++----------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index 286a95304e03..b240be71f21f 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -748,12 +748,6 @@ int sk_psock_msg_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sk_psock_msg_verdict);
-static int sk_psock_bpf_run(struct sk_psock *psock, struct bpf_prog *prog,
- struct sk_buff *skb)
-{
- return bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, skb);
-}
-
static void sk_psock_skb_redirect(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct sk_psock *psock_other;
@@ -811,7 +805,7 @@ int sk_psock_tls_strp_read(struct sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb)
skb->sk = psock->sk;
skb_dst_drop(skb);
skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);
- ret = sk_psock_bpf_run(psock, prog, skb);
+ ret = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, skb);
ret = sk_psock_map_verd(ret, skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb));
skb->sk = NULL;
}
@@ -898,7 +892,7 @@ static void sk_psock_strp_read(struct strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *skb)
if (likely(prog)) {
skb_dst_drop(skb);
skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);
- ret = sk_psock_bpf_run(psock, prog, skb);
+ ret = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, skb);
ret = sk_psock_map_verd(ret, skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb));
}
sk_psock_verdict_apply(psock, skb, ret);
@@ -921,7 +915,7 @@ static int sk_psock_strp_parse(struct strparser *strp, struct sk_buff *skb)
prog = READ_ONCE(psock->progs.stream_parser);
if (likely(prog)) {
skb->sk = psock->sk;
- ret = sk_psock_bpf_run(psock, prog, skb);
+ ret = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, skb);
skb->sk = NULL;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -1014,7 +1008,7 @@ static int sk_psock_verdict_recv(read_descriptor_t *desc, struct sk_buff *skb,
if (likely(prog)) {
skb_dst_drop(skb);
skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);
- ret = sk_psock_bpf_run(psock, prog, skb);
+ ret = bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(prog, skb);
ret = sk_psock_map_verd(ret, skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb));
}
sk_psock_verdict_apply(psock, skb, ret);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-20 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-20 5:29 [Patch bpf-next v6 0/8] sock_map: clean up and refactor code for BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT Cong Wang
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 1/8] bpf: clean up sockmap related Kconfigs Cong Wang
2021-02-22 8:51 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-22 23:23 ` Cong Wang
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 2/8] skmsg: get rid of struct sk_psock_parser Cong Wang
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 3/8] bpf: compute data_end dynamically with JIT code Cong Wang
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 4/8] skmsg: move sk_redir from TCP_SKB_CB to skb Cong Wang
2021-02-22 12:20 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-22 19:27 ` Cong Wang
2021-02-23 17:52 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-23 18:04 ` Cong Wang
2021-02-23 18:36 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 5/8] sock_map: rename skb_parser and skb_verdict Cong Wang
2021-02-22 12:28 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-22 19:32 ` Cong Wang
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 6/8] sock_map: make sock_map_prog_update() static Cong Wang
2021-02-22 12:29 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-20 5:29 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 7/8] skmsg: make __sk_psock_purge_ingress_msg() static Cong Wang
2021-02-22 12:30 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-20 5:29 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2021-02-22 12:31 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 8/8] skmsg: get rid of sk_psock_bpf_run() Jakub Sitnicki
2021-02-22 12:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v6 0/8] sock_map: clean up and refactor code for BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210220052924.106599-9-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=jiang.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).