From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] wl3501_cs: Fix out-of-bounds warnings in wl3501_mgmt_join
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 12:58:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202104151257.DC4DA20@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1fbaf516da763b50edac47d792a9145aa4482e29.1618442265.git.gustavoars@kernel.org>
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 06:45:15PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Fix the following out-of-bounds warnings by adding a new structure
> wl3501_req instead of duplicating the same members in structure
> wl3501_join_req and wl3501_scan_confirm:
>
> arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h:182:25: warning: '__builtin_memcpy' offset [39, 108] from the object at 'sig' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'beacon_period' with type 'short unsigned int' at offset 36 [-Warray-bounds]
> arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h:182:25: warning: '__builtin_memcpy' offset [25, 95] from the object at 'sig' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'beacon_period' with type 'short unsigned int' at offset 22 [-Warray-bounds]
>
> Refactor the code, accordingly:
>
> $ pahole -C wl3501_req drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.o
> struct wl3501_req {
> u16 beacon_period; /* 0 2 */
> u16 dtim_period; /* 2 2 */
> u16 cap_info; /* 4 2 */
> u8 bss_type; /* 6 1 */
> u8 bssid[6]; /* 7 6 */
> struct iw_mgmt_essid_pset ssid; /* 13 34 */
> struct iw_mgmt_ds_pset ds_pset; /* 47 3 */
> struct iw_mgmt_cf_pset cf_pset; /* 50 8 */
> struct iw_mgmt_ibss_pset ibss_pset; /* 58 4 */
> struct iw_mgmt_data_rset bss_basic_rset; /* 62 10 */
>
> /* size: 72, cachelines: 2, members: 10 */
> /* last cacheline: 8 bytes */
> };
>
> $ pahole -C wl3501_join_req drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.o
> struct wl3501_join_req {
> u16 next_blk; /* 0 2 */
> u8 sig_id; /* 2 1 */
> u8 reserved; /* 3 1 */
> struct iw_mgmt_data_rset operational_rset; /* 4 10 */
> u16 reserved2; /* 14 2 */
> u16 timeout; /* 16 2 */
> u16 probe_delay; /* 18 2 */
> u8 timestamp[8]; /* 20 8 */
> u8 local_time[8]; /* 28 8 */
> struct wl3501_req req; /* 36 72 */
>
> /* size: 108, cachelines: 2, members: 10 */
> /* last cacheline: 44 bytes */
> };
>
> $ pahole -C wl3501_scan_confirm drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.o
> struct wl3501_scan_confirm {
> u16 next_blk; /* 0 2 */
> u8 sig_id; /* 2 1 */
> u8 reserved; /* 3 1 */
> u16 status; /* 4 2 */
> char timestamp[8]; /* 6 8 */
> char localtime[8]; /* 14 8 */
> struct wl3501_req req; /* 22 72 */
> /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) was 30 bytes ago --- */
> u8 rssi; /* 94 1 */
>
> /* size: 96, cachelines: 2, members: 8 */
> /* padding: 1 */
> /* last cacheline: 32 bytes */
> };
>
> The problem is that the original code is trying to copy data into a
> bunch of struct members adjacent to each other in a single call to
> memcpy(). Now that a new struct wl3501_req enclosing all those adjacent
> members is introduced, memcpy() doesn't overrun the length of
> &sig.beacon_period and &this->bss_set[i].beacon_period, because the
> address of the new struct object _req_ is used as the destination,
> instead.
>
> This helps with the ongoing efforts to globally enable -Warray-bounds
> and get us closer to being able to tighten the FORTIFY_SOURCE routines
> on memcpy().
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Awesome! Thank you for this solution.
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-15 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-14 23:40 [PATCH v3 0/2] Fix out-of-bounds warnings Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-04-14 23:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] wl3501_cs: Fix out-of-bounds warnings in wl3501_send_pkt Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-04-22 14:39 ` Kalle Valo
[not found] ` <20210422143910.C8B5CC4338A@smtp.codeaurora.org>
2021-04-22 18:30 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-04-14 23:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] wl3501_cs: Fix out-of-bounds warnings in wl3501_mgmt_join Gustavo A. R. Silva
2021-04-15 19:58 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2021-04-15 20:59 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202104151257.DC4DA20@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).