From: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] bpf_trace: pass array of u64 values in kprobe_multi.addrs
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 16:43:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220519144309.GB22773@asgard.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzYNa0F21ydMLvmeGZWzvO_o5Fh0Af0zwWGNxMh6emQTSg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 04:50:58PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 12:37 AM Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > With the interface as defined, it is impossible to pass 64-bit kernel
> > addresses from a 32-bit userspace process in BPF_LINK_TYPE_KPROBE_MULTI,
> > which severly limits the useability of the interface, change the ABI
> > to accept an array of u64 values instead of (kernel? user?) longs.
> > Interestingly, the rest of the libbpf infrastructure uses 64-bit values
> > for kallsyms addresses already, so this patch also eliminates
> > the sym_addr cast in tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c:resolve_kprobe_multi_cb().
> >
> > Fixes: 0dcac272540613d4 ("bpf: Add multi kprobe link")
> > Fixes: 5117c26e877352bc ("libbpf: Add bpf_link_create support for multi kprobes")
> > Fixes: ddc6b04989eb0993 ("libbpf: Add bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts function")
> > Fixes: f7a11eeccb111854 ("selftests/bpf: Add kprobe_multi attach test")
> > Fixes: 9271a0c7ae7a9147 ("selftests/bpf: Add attach test for bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts")
> > Fixes: 2c6401c966ae1fbe ("selftests/bpf: Add kprobe_multi bpf_cookie test")
> > Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++----
>
> kernel changes should go into a separate patch
Sure, they can be split, the only reason they are this way is to keep
API/ABI in sync between the kernel code and the user space one.
> (and seems like they
> logically fit together with patch #3, no?)
Patch #3 doesn't change the API/ABI, it only fixes the implementation
in terms of compat handling (and it is more straightforward),
that is why I decided to have it separately. The compat handling
of addrs, on the other hand, can't be fixed without the ABI change.
> > tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 2 +-
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 8 +++----
> > tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 2 +-
> > .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_cookie.c | 2 +-
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_multi_test.c | 8 +++----
> > 6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
>
> [...]
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 14:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-17 7:36 [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/4] Fix 32-bit arch and compat support for the kprobe_multi attach type Eugene Syromiatnikov
2022-05-17 7:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/4] bpf_trace: check size for overflow in bpf_kprobe_multi_link_attach Eugene Syromiatnikov
2022-05-17 9:12 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-05-18 23:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-19 14:37 ` Eugene Syromiatnikov
2022-05-20 0:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-17 7:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] bpf_trace: support 32-bit kernels " Eugene Syromiatnikov
2022-05-17 9:12 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-05-18 23:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-17 7:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 3/4] bpf_trace: handle compat in copy_user_syms Eugene Syromiatnikov
2022-05-18 23:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-17 7:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] bpf_trace: pass array of u64 values in kprobe_multi.addrs Eugene Syromiatnikov
2022-05-17 9:12 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-05-17 12:30 ` Eugene Syromiatnikov
2022-05-17 20:03 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-05-17 21:34 ` Yonghong Song
2022-05-18 11:24 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-05-18 12:30 ` Eugene Syromiatnikov
2022-05-18 23:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-18 23:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-19 17:33 ` Eugene Syromiatnikov
2022-05-20 23:16 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-18 23:50 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-05-19 14:43 ` Eugene Syromiatnikov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220519144309.GB22773@asgard.redhat.com \
--to=esyr@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).