From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503E1C43334 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 08:14:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229785AbiFHIOS (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2022 04:14:18 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47180 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231907AbiFHIM0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2022 04:12:26 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311852D3B11; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 00:41:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 2587YfRW007669; Wed, 8 Jun 2022 09:34:41 +0200 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 09:34:41 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Moshe Kol Cc: kernel test robot , Jakub Kicinski , Yossi Gilad , Amit Klein , Eric Dumazet , LKML , netdev@vger.kernel.org, lkp@lists.01.org, lkp@intel.com, ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com Subject: Re: [tcp] e926147618: stress-ng.icmp-flood.ops_per_sec -8.7% regression Message-ID: <20220608073441.GE7547@1wt.eu> References: <20220608060802.GA22428@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <20220608064822.GC7547@1wt.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 10:26:12AM +0300, Moshe Kol wrote: > Hmm, How is the ICMP flood stress test related to TCP connections? To me it's not directly related, unless the test pre-establishes many connections, or is affected in a way or another by a larger memory allocation of this part. Willy