On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 06:58:18PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > Queued all of the below: > with one tweaked as per your suggestion and the highlighted one dropped on basis > I was already carrying the equivalent - as you pointed out. > > I was already carrying the required dependency. > > Includes the IIO ones in staging. > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > > p.s. I perhaps foolishly did this in a highly manual way so as to > also pick up Andy's RB. So might have dropped one... You could have done: H=$(git rev-parse @) b4 am -P 49-190 20221118224540.619276-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.org git am ... git filter-branch -f --msg-filter "grep -v 'Signed-off-by: Jonathan'; echo 'Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko '; echo 'Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron '" $H.. (untested, but you get the idea). > Definitely would have been better as one patch per subsystem with > a cover letter suitable for replies like Andy's to be picked up > by b4. Next time I will go for one series per subsystem which I like better than one patch per subsystem. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |