On 21.11.2022 19:10:30, Zhang Changzhong wrote: > If pci_iomap() or register_sja1000dev() fails, netdev will not be > registered, but plx_pci_del_card() still deregisters the netdev. > > To avoid this, let's free the netdev and clear card->net_dev[i] before > calling plx_pci_del_card(). In addition, add the missing pci_iounmap() > when the channel does not exist. > > Compile tested only. > > Fixes: 951f2f960e5b ("drivers/net/can/sja1000/plx_pci.c: eliminate double free") > Fixes: 24c4a3b29255 ("can: add support for CAN interface cards based on the PLX90xx PCI bridge") > Signed-off-by: Zhang Changzhong > --- > drivers/net/can/sja1000/plx_pci.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/plx_pci.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/plx_pci.c > index 5de1ebb..1158f5a 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/plx_pci.c > +++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/plx_pci.c > @@ -678,6 +678,8 @@ static int plx_pci_add_card(struct pci_dev *pdev, > if (!addr) { > err = -ENOMEM; > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to remap BAR%d\n", cm->bar); > + free_sja1000dev(dev); > + card->net_dev[i] = NULL; > goto failure_cleanup; > } > > @@ -699,6 +701,9 @@ static int plx_pci_add_card(struct pci_dev *pdev, > if (err) { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Registering device failed " > "(err=%d)\n", err); > + pci_iounmap(pdev, priv->reg_base); > + free_sja1000dev(dev); > + card->net_dev[i] = NULL; > goto failure_cleanup; > } > > @@ -710,6 +715,7 @@ static int plx_pci_add_card(struct pci_dev *pdev, > } else { > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Channel #%d not detected\n", > i + 1); > + pci_iounmap(pdev, priv->reg_base); > free_sja1000dev(dev); > card->net_dev[i] = NULL; There's quite some cleanup code doubling. Can you introduce a goto style cleanup? Marc -- Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de | Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |