netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 08/15] net/mlx5e: Add hairpin debugfs files
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 10:48:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230117104851.2c722c6e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac5bf8cd-c30a-0c36-a6ca-a95a8ed0d152@nvidia.com>

On Sun, 15 Jan 2023 12:04:58 +0200 Gal Pressman wrote:
> The hairpin queues are different than other queues in the driver as they
> are controlled by the device (refill, completion handling, etc.).
> Hardware configuration can make a difference in performance when working
> with hairpin, things that wouldn't necessarily affect regular queues the
> driver uses. The debugging process is also more difficult as the driver
> has little control/visibility over these.
> 
> At the end of the day, the debug process *is* going to be playing with
> the queue size/number, this allows us to potentially find a number that
> releases the bottleneck and see how it affects other stages in the pipe.
> Since these cases are unlikely to happen, and changing of these
> parameters can affect the device in other ways, we don't want people to
> just increase them when they encounter performance issues, especially
> not in production environments.
> 
> Does that make sense?

Okay, I think my guess that "debug" here means "wobble it to see if 
the device can go faster" was indeed correct. Long term maybe we should
find a better word for that than "debug".

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-17 19:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-11  5:30 [pull request][net-next 00/15] mlx5 updates 2023-01-10 Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 01/15] net/mlx5: Expose shared buffer registers bits and structs Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  9:10   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 02/15] net/mlx5e: Add API to query/modify SBPR and SBCM registers Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 03/15] net/mlx5e: Update shared buffer along with device buffer changes Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 04/15] net/mlx5e: Add Ethernet driver debugfs Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 05/15] net/mlx5e: kTLS, Add debugfs Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11 18:32   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 20:20     ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11 20:52       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 06/15] net/mlx5e: Add hairpin params structure Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 07/15] net/mlx5e: Add flow steering debugfs directory Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 08/15] net/mlx5e: Add hairpin debugfs files Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11 18:34   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 20:46     ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11 21:03       ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 23:01         ` Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-12  3:46           ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-12  9:17             ` Gal Pressman
2023-01-12 22:20               ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-15 10:04                 ` Gal Pressman
2023-01-17 18:48                   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 09/15] net/mlx5: Enable management PF initialization Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 10/15] net/mlx5: Introduce and use opcode getter in command interface Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 11/15] net/mlx5: Prevent high-rate FW commands from populating all slots Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 12/15] net/mlx5e: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 13/15] net/mlx5e: Replace 0-length array with flexible array Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 14/15] net/mlx5: remove redundant ret variable Saeed Mahameed
2023-01-11  5:30 ` [net-next 15/15] net/mlx5e: Use kzalloc() in mlx5e_accel_fs_tcp_create() Saeed Mahameed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230117104851.2c722c6e@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gal@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeed@kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
    --cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).