From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@sberdevices.ru, oxffffaa@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] several updates to virtio/vsock
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 17:32:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230309163200.lq6dzop724diafpf@sgarzare-redhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a1788ed6-89d4-27da-a049-99e29edea4cb@sberdevices.ru>
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 07:20:20PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>
>
>On 09.03.2023 19:21, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 01:10:36PM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> this patchset evolved from previous v2 version (see link below). It does
>>> several updates to virtio/vsock:
>>> 1) Changes 'virtio_transport_inc/dec_rx_pkt()' interface. Now instead of
>>> using skbuff state ('head' and 'data' pointers) to update 'fwd_cnt'
>>> and 'rx_bytes', integer value is passed as an input argument. This
>>> makes code more simple, because in this case we don't need to udpate
>>> skbuff state before calling 'virtio_transport_inc/dec_rx_pkt()'. In
>>> more common words - we don't need to change skbuff state to update
>>> 'rx_bytes' and 'fwd_cnt' correctly.
>>> 2) For SOCK_STREAM, when copying data to user fails, current skbuff is
>>> not dropped. Next read attempt will use same skbuff and last offset.
>>> Instead of 'skb_dequeue()', 'skb_peek()' + '__skb_unlink()' are used.
>>> This behaviour was implemented before skbuff support.
>>> 3) For SOCK_SEQPACKET it removes unneeded 'skb_pull()' call, because for
>>> this type of socket each skbuff is used only once: after removing it
>>> from socket's queue, it will be freed anyway.
>>>
>>> Test for 2) also added:
>>> Test tries to 'recv()' data to NULL buffer, then does 'recv()' with valid
>>> buffer. For SOCK_STREAM second 'recv()' must return data, because skbuff
>>> must not be dropped, but for SOCK_SEQPACKET skbuff will be dropped by
>>> kernel, and 'recv()' will return EAGAIN.
>>>
>>> Link to v1 on lore:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/c2d3e204-89d9-88e9-8a15-3fe027e56b4b@sberdevices.ru/
>>>
>>> Link to v2 on lore:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/a7ab414b-5e41-c7b6-250b-e8401f335859@sberdevices.ru/
>>>
>>> Change log:
>>>
>>> v1 -> v2:
>>> - For SOCK_SEQPACKET call 'skb_pull()' also in case of copy failure or
>>> dropping skbuff (when we just waiting message end).
>>> - Handle copy failure for SOCK_STREAM in the same manner (plus free
>>> current skbuff).
>>> - Replace bug repdroducer with new test in vsock_test.c
>>>
>>> v2 -> v3:
>>> - Replace patch which removes 'skb->len' subtraction from function
>>> 'virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt()' with patch which updates functions
>>> 'virtio_transport_inc/dec_rx_pkt()' by passing integer argument
>>> instead of skbuff pointer.
>>> - Replace patch which drops skbuff when copying to user fails with
>>> patch which changes this behaviour by keeping skbuff in queue until
>>> it has no data.
>>> - Add patch for SOCK_SEQPACKET which removes redundant 'skb_pull()'
>>> call on read.
>>> - I remove "Fixes" tag from all patches, because all of them now change
>>> code logic, not only fix something.
>>
>> Yes, but they solve the problem, so we should use the tag (I think at
>> least in patch 1 and 3).
>>
>> We usually use the tag when we are fixing a problem introduced by a
>> previous change. So we need to backport the patch to the stable branches
>> as well, and we need the tag to figure out which branches have the patch
>> or not.
>Ahh, sorry. Ok. I see now :)
No problem at all :-)
I think also patch 2 can have the Fixes tag.
Thanks,
Stefano
>
>Thanks, Arseniy
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Stefano
>>
>>>
>>> Arseniy Krasnov (4):
>>> virtio/vsock: don't use skbuff state to account credit
>>> virtio/vsock: remove redundant 'skb_pull()' call
>>> virtio/vsock: don't drop skbuff on copy failure
>>> test/vsock: copy to user failure test
>>>
>>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 29 +++---
>>> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> --
>>> 2.25.1
>>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-09 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-09 10:10 [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] several updates to virtio/vsock Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-09 10:11 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] virtio/vsock: don't use skbuff state to account credit Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-09 16:27 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-09 10:12 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] virtio/vsock: remove redundant 'skb_pull()' call Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-09 16:29 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-09 10:13 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] virtio/vsock: don't drop skbuff on copy failure Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-09 16:30 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-09 10:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] test/vsock: copy to user failure test Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-09 16:30 ` Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-09 16:21 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] several updates to virtio/vsock Stefano Garzarella
2023-03-09 16:20 ` Arseniy Krasnov
2023-03-09 16:32 ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2023-03-09 20:34 ` Arseniy Krasnov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230309163200.lq6dzop724diafpf@sgarzare-redhat \
--to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=avkrasnov@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kernel@sberdevices.ru \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oxffffaa@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).