From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DD963734F for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 20:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F33642128 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2023 13:53:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1686171186; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ft5xiF/Ta3lHBxFgPgTJpXvjBg2+fN90ep4jurEd3BE=; b=HYqQy44yTPd3obRjQyvQ1G+KTMKa+urRv5HDgEHRyAon4tgJOutOfKwPwK2u0CNPUvzvgA rLRijb9uTD2XAo7yCCQVqD1ma1E5sRP+GQwppbo8rvrs4Z9gJq2WMzIyaCYpRDLshBAIXZ Km1iFlYHez6OxPooWWK6QDMUqT7usnU= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-119-N7tndprGNzqfZQILTXpR9A-1; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 16:53:05 -0400 X-MC-Unique: N7tndprGNzqfZQILTXpR9A-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-30793c16c78so10694576f8f.3 for ; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 13:53:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1686171184; x=1688763184; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ft5xiF/Ta3lHBxFgPgTJpXvjBg2+fN90ep4jurEd3BE=; b=T0Oceiadibc2j9bPMIkCqoVkofqZx7QVRqlpgjVY0hAjHsoS2TAQFLP6cGkBICVQOp NN7wI2mJ2sAcgu6GtXftR1hnXH01LNjR0Jy/G6gFO8FUstOoCCgvIwJVn1dZegPGcWWA CR4gStBG9SDeHoHXOK+Cs4v2jHQceHoAKH5ya0cBNBlmBMcs5PsZZSg5SCdR+tpxmPh3 3KFWSiqJkuKmH+kkjZsXg9GjtE2LvdHIhMY/rWrQEFnVIVi7ub2KrZe5oOQ+ZGKut1w/ 4akOiFziL2PKHT3RjjFKDM2XJn6aIINoJO7yr96IJSYIIHGJJupLLFHJAipntqlz7FY0 zy7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwuPCAVpa7wauFXjQW3HP9p2xIUvX11f6PIv0aft9vknF9t6Lg7 3Wn8sQPRRnfgkhVqPNI2ET0PCG3zZ/mYikLQjyENVOcd9CoT0wD4/S66X1ZVv6px/aHDmvqU2Bn UWk6DrmTfw4xDU71J X-Received: by 2002:a5d:58e7:0:b0:30a:e5b7:a290 with SMTP id f7-20020a5d58e7000000b0030ae5b7a290mr5386605wrd.15.1686171184000; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 13:53:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7Uq6PcUd+YOTWXVp6ailbjy7D3AfyP/yNhUjsRFNK0FKM+EidonNaUBgJwfcpN5SMVyMEYIw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:58e7:0:b0:30a:e5b7:a290 with SMTP id f7-20020a5d58e7000000b0030ae5b7a290mr5386597wrd.15.1686171183665; Wed, 07 Jun 2023 13:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhat.com ([2.55.41.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j10-20020adff54a000000b003047ae72b14sm16389987wrp.82.2023.06.07.13.53.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 07 Jun 2023 13:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 16:52:59 -0400 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: Stefano Garzarella Cc: Shannon Nelson , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Wang , Eugenio =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=E9rez?= , Tiwei Bie , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost-vdpa: filter VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED feature Message-ID: <20230607165205-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20230605110644.151211-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> <20230605084104-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <24fjdwp44hovz3d3qkzftmvjie45er3g3boac7aezpvzbwvuol@lmo47ydvnqau> <20230605085840-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <20230605095404-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> <32ejjuvhvcicv7wjuetkv34qtlpa657n4zlow4eq3fsi2twozk@iqnd2t5tw2an> <20230605173958-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 05:44:50PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 04:56:37PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:54:57AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 03:30:35PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 09:00:25AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 02:54:20PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 08:41:54AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 01:06:44PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > > > > > > > vhost-vdpa IOCTLs (eg. VHOST_GET_VRING_BASE, VHOST_SET_VRING_BASE) > > > > > > > > > don't support packed virtqueue well yet, so let's filter the > > > > > > > > > VIRTIO_F_RING_PACKED feature for now in vhost_vdpa_get_features(). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This way, even if the device supports it, we don't risk it being > > > > > > > > > negotiated, then the VMM is unable to set the vring state properly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 4c8cf31885f6 ("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend") > > > > > > > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Notes: > > > > > > > > > This patch should be applied before the "[PATCH v2 0/3] vhost_vdpa: > > > > > > > > > better PACKED support" series [1] and backported in stable branches. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We can revert it when we are sure that everything is working with > > > > > > > > > packed virtqueues. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > Stefano > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/20230424225031.18947-1-shannon.nelson@amd.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm a bit lost here. So why am I merging "better PACKED support" then? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To really support packed virtqueue with vhost-vdpa, at that point we would > > > > > > > also have to revert this patch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wasn't sure if you wanted to queue the series for this merge window. > > > > > > > In that case do you think it is better to send this patch only for stable > > > > > > > branches? > > > > > > > > Does this patch make them a NOP? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yep, after applying the "better PACKED support" series and being > > > > > > > sure that > > > > > > > the IOCTLs of vhost-vdpa support packed virtqueue, we should revert this > > > > > > > patch. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let me know if you prefer a different approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm concerned that QEMU uses vhost-vdpa IOCTLs thinking that the kernel > > > > > > > interprets them the right way, when it does not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Stefano > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If this fixes a bug can you add Fixes tags to each of them? Then it's ok > > > > > > to merge in this window. Probably easier than the elaborate > > > > > > mask/unmask dance. > > > > > > > > > > CCing Shannon (the original author of the "better PACKED support" > > > > > series). > > > > > > > > > > IIUC Shannon is going to send a v3 of that series to fix the > > > > > documentation, so Shannon can you also add the Fixes tags? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Stefano > > > > > > > > Well this is in my tree already. Just reply with > > > > Fixes: <> > > > > to each and I will add these tags. > > > > > > I tried, but it is not easy since we added the support for packed virtqueue > > > in vdpa and vhost incrementally. > > > > > > Initially I was thinking of adding the same tag used here: > > > > > > Fixes: 4c8cf31885f6 ("vhost: introduce vDPA-based backend") > > > > > > Then I discovered that vq_state wasn't there, so I was thinking of > > > > > > Fixes: 530a5678bc00 ("vdpa: support packed virtqueue for set/get_vq_state()") > > > > > > So we would have to backport quite a few patches into the stable branches. > > > I don't know if it's worth it... > > > > > > I still think it is better to disable packed in the stable branches, > > > otherwise I have to make a list of all the patches we need. > > > > > > Any other ideas? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Stefano > > > > OK so. You want me to apply this one now, and fixes in the next > > kernel? > > Yep, it seems to me the least risky approach. > > Thanks, > Stefano I'd like something more general though. Bring back the allowlist? Jason, your thoughts? -- MST